Changes for Dreamtime

[gold1]

the 3 key areas we are lacking statistically against the Bombers:

Efficiency in the 50

Bombers 51 per cent Tiges 44

Centre clearances

Bombers 14 Tiges 10

Turnovers

Bombers 67 Tiges 75

We need to improve.

 

[toothless]

Bombers have a pretty short back line

193 Baldwin
192 langford
195 Ridley


Will be interesting to see who takes Nank/Ryan when foward and Ridley is more of an interceptor rather than a Key big defender that plays on a man.

Redman is a player we need to keep a watch on and they run their attacks from backs through him

Zerk-Thatcher is their equal tallest KPD named (plays taller than Ridley). Highly doubt Langford plays defence at all. Their back 7 will be ZT, Baldwin, Ridley, Redman, Heppell, Hind, & McGrath.

 

[TigerMasochist]

Redman is a player we need to keep a watch on and they run their attacks from backs through him

Would love to see Foosh Pickett on the Redman. Reckon New Years Eve fireworks might come early, get some hard n narky footy happening.

 

[waiting]

the 3 key areas we are lacking statistically against the Bombers:

Efficiency in the 50

Bombers 51 per cent Tiges 44

Centre clearances

Bombers 14 Tiges 10

Turnovers

Bombers 67 Tiges 75

We need to improve.

It’s going to be wet, ball on the ground a lot and head over the pill.

It’s going to be who wants it more.

13 in a row I think for the Tigers. It’s going to end ‘one day’. Let’s hope it’s not tomorrow night.

Huge game.

Bombers 4 loses in a row . They have played good sides who are in the 8 and playing good footy compared to last year. Undermanned defence which won’t be that much of a factor against the Tigers as we are not that tall forward.

How reflective is / was our second half against West Coast and our four quarter effort against the Cats. ????

 

[DavidSSS]

Essendon with a not so tall back line . . . such a pity Lynch is out.

DS