Theres only one McJesusAgree.
He might be another Vickery, Elton, McBean, Post, Griffens
Trade him before he is delisted for nothing
It does, only because we are reigning premiers.CJs value keeps increasing the more he doesn’t play...
Lets see what CCJ do at AFL level before we consign him to that 'illustrious company'Agree.
He might be another Vickery, Elton, McBean, Post, Griffens
Trade him before he is delisted for nothing
having another tall replacing a small could be advantageous! We lacked one tall option in our forward line, what I saw was melbourne flooding back with gawn. Hard to bring the ball down. Move jack up the ground CCJ & LynchPlayed ok today. Definitely can mark the ball. Queries over his decision making and disposal.
Yeah, that forward line would give a few defences nightmares.Was the shinning light yesterday I thought , not starring but good signs . Rudeford said somewhere that he’s too slow for a KPP , I don’t disagree, however I see him been able to play very well as our deepest forward , he’s bloody strong with great hands and think he’ll be better suited as the stay at home then Lynch or Jack and if the smalls can find there timing they should be able to swop plenty as CJ won’t get out marked very often one on one.
Castagna -CJ- MJ
Jack -Lynch- Rioli D
And allow Balta and DTLD to stay in defence where they can be most use to the team.CJ would've taken more marks yesterday than Nank, Jack R and Lynch combined last night. That's not a criticism of them, CJ is simply an outstanding mark.
I know it's a different level, but I'm sure, whether he's forward or in the ruck CJ will get his hands on the ball, and when he does he'll mark it, because he's a one grabber.
CJ's inclusion must happen, it will give us another outlet, and will free up Jack and Tom and give Nank a chop out.