It's the old success having a 1000 fathers thing I reckon UK.
There were plenty of whispers that Cotchin and his Mrs were difficult over the years but now he is seen as the oracle of all leadership. I reckon if Deledio played in the 2017 flag he would be lauded as well.
A rising tide lifts all boats is truer in football than anywhere else. Was Mick Malthouse really a supercoach with West Coast and Collingwood and then hopeless with Carlton?
Was Denis Pagan really supreme at bringing young player through from the under 19s into premiership sides at North Melbourne, but incapable of it at Carlton?
Was Greg Miller the most astute footy boss of all time who could find players like Carey and Longmire when no-one else could at North and then a basket case at Richmond?
Is Terry Wallace a coach who was capable of doing great things with the Bulldogs or a coach who was inept at Richmond?
Are O'Neal, Balme, Gale, Hardwick etc that much better than everyone else that ran Richmond previously or any other club currently?
For what it's worth I think the answer is mostly pure luck.
We were lucky that we stayed healthy, players we drafted developed into great players all over the ground, we were in the right place at the right time to snare some great players via free agency, and Dustin produced one of the great seasons of all time which helped instil confidence and belief amongst the entire team.
On the back of that, everybody looks great and everything they touch turns to gold but I reckon deep down not even the people involved could explain the difference between success and failure.
I agree with the notion that success has 1,000 parents, but, while luck is involved, I reckon there is a fair bit of hard work and good work.
I remember many years ago wondering how Essendon used to find lots of young talented players who would come through and be good at AFL level while Richmond had many young hopes who went nowhere. Luck? I think not. The facilities, the coaching staff, the club culture, these things matter and make a big difference. The best example wears 44 at Richmond today. Clearly Stack has plenty of talent, but I don't think he would have made it at any club - only at clubs that can give him an environment he can thrive in.
This is just one example of the many pieces of the puzzle that clubs do have control over which can make a big difference.
Many people said we were lucky with injuries in 2017 and it contributed to winning the flag, and a fair comment that is. But in 2019, what's the comment on this year? I've heard it said that because of our injuries we had the luck to have players fresh at the right time of the year. So many players who were not hammered from a whole season because they had games off earlier in the year due to injury. So, we're lucky when we don't get injuries and lucky when we do? Sorry, I don't buy that, it isn't luck that allows Richmond to win a flag with no injuries and a lot of players having 24 games in a row prior to the Grand Final in 2017, and survive a lot of injuries in 2019 and still win. It is mainly good management, with a little luck thrown in (you always need some!).
Back to Delidio: if we were more successful, if we had better facilities and staff when he was young, could he have been fitter for longer? Who knows, but I reckon it might have helped. I agree he would likely have been different to what some of the rumours say, had he been at Richmond in 2017 when the culture had improved.
So, yeah, there's luck, and that's one of those things we can't control, but there is also good management, that we can control.
DS