Good luck in making the Huns another Richmond.According to the Hun article Brando says he was told mid year that he was not required. It does not sound like a contract issue.
Good luck in making the Huns another Richmond.According to the Hun article Brando says he was told mid year that he was not required. It does not sound like a contract issue.
Not required but played ever game including finals and the grand final?
Huh
At $625k a year, yes, he was told he wasn't required. Club would have kept him on reduced pay, B.Ellis new it.Not required but played ever game including finals and the grand final?
Huh
Not required but played ever game including finals and the grand final?
Huh
His type is arguably the easiest to replace and good list management strategy by informing him mid year IMO.
Not really. This is simply developed through the leadership of the older players, the club culture ingrained into the youngsters as they grow within the team.but it is much harder to find replacements who buy into our ethos and game plan effectively
Big Bad busling Brando will be back for the premiership favourites this week against the mighty Crows.
He has recovered from calf soreness
Well said!We actually miss his hard running on the wing. Forget the occasional skill errors and contested ball issues, but his ability to run all game coupled with Caddy being out against Collingwood exposed us on the wings I reckon. Might have to revisit McIntosh and/or Naish/Balta for these roles. We have to have gut runners on the wing who get back to defend when needed.
Maybe but not sure he would have made much of a difference tonight. Think we are just playing crap at the moment and trying to find some logical reasonsWe might regret letting him go
We might regret letting him go
We might regret letting him go
Not so much letting him go, more regretting we don't seem to have an obvious replacement. Need Naish to grab a wing spot.