I'm a fan of Huddo but geez I'm glad it was Gerard on the mic for all four of those goals. He just ... grasps the moment.Whateley‘s call of all four of Dusty’s goals was superb. Goosebumps.
That six minutes is fantastic. Time capsule stuff.
Yes, he's a fan. Yes, he was able to subdue the fact he's a Cats supporter and call the game well.
You can be an AFL Lapdog and still call a good game of footy and love the spectacle that is a Richmond win.
But the campaigning he did when Gil & Hocking needed him to get us all ready for significant changes to the rules won't be forgotten easily. Brushing that off as a reaction to how he treats Richmond is just being lazy or trying very hard to be the #2 Contrarian of PRE.
Have to agree here, his interview technique is awesome & he's a brilliant broadcaster. his agenda pushing is where he loses meCredit to Gerard also being a Cats supporter but maintaining his total professionalism & being totally invested in those plays. Many don't.
He's at his best when he's calling, not pushing agendas.
Is this the 6-6-6 you're referring to, @Baloo? I don't recall who was on that train and who wasn't but it's fair to say everyone, not just Whateley, had a point of view on it. Given it was a significant talking point at the time, you can't be surprised he provided an opinion.But the campaigning he did when Gil & Hocking needed him to get us all ready for significant changes to the rules won't be forgotten easily.
I suppose I find it hard to reconcile that someone can put aside his biases to professionally commentate on the game while at the same time pushing agendas at the behest of someone else. Doesn't strike me as being logical, and I'm not even sure why he'd do that. His currency, surely, is independence?Brushing that off as a reaction to how he treats Richmond is just being lazy or trying very hard to be the #2 Contrarian of PRE.
I'm #2 Contrarian and no-one can take that away from me
Yes as I posted the other day he is much better caller than he is a pontificator. His preaching can be cringeworthy.Credit to Gerard also being a Cats supporter but maintaining his total professionalism & being totally invested in those plays. Many don't.
He's at his best when he's calling, not pushing agendas.
Is this the 6-6-6 you're referring to, @Baloo? I don't recall who was on that train and who wasn't but it's fair to say everyone, not just Whateley, had a point of view on it. Given it was a significant talking point at the time, you can't be surprised he provided an opinion.
Twilight actually. But you notice that anyone who prefers day is just being silly, stubborn and rooted in the past? Dismisses them very quickly, again.obvious he was pushing the night grand final agenda also
Or has he back-tracked to being a 'twilight' fan now? That's what I heard him support post GF but it was one of the few times I had listened to him recently (wanted to hear the humble pie being acknowledged!).obvious he was pushing the night grand final agenda also
As a counter proposal to the suggestion of retaining the 16 minute quarters next year, Danger, Gerard and Hocking are pushing that the quarters be allowed to go out to 18 minutes each while reducing the number of quarters per game to 2.Yeah, agree with this. he's an AFL Lapdog first and foremost, pushing their agenda hard. The 6 6 6 and other rule changes that year were implemented after a year long campaign of Whately bringing it up at every chance on every platform. The game needs help, The scores are too low. We need more goals. AFL's duty is to change. Hocking has his committee loaded with stats and facts and AI and ML and they will bring the game back to a high scoring extravaganza.
The fact that since those rules changes we've had less goals than ever before is never mentioned. If anyone dares mention it, the blame goes to the coaches for focusing on winning games rather than making them exciting.
I'm #2 Contrarian and no-one can take that away from me