They're already suggesting a dockland GFPretty sure we can't have the MCG in October due to the T20 world cup
They're already suggesting a dockland GFPretty sure we can't have the MCG in October due to the T20 world cup
They're already suggesting a dockland GF
What did he bloody sayTotally agree with what Sheahan said tonight.
Am I the only one who finds that a strange concept in a reduced season? And how is it a legitimate group of finalists if 3/5 of the competition are finalists?
He said he caught a tram today and held onto the strap and hadn't washed his hands...... at which point Robbo said..... That's a bloody disgrace Mike, to which Sheahan replied.....What did he bloody say
What did he bloody say
Me too! What did he say?
They're already suggesting a dockland GF
More to the point, as Jack said it's an industry, there are more than the players that stand to loose. It's all about the players to a point, if they don't show, no one involved in the industry gets anything. from what I can tell is, that if 22 rounds can be played, after everything shakes out, play them, then all the bar staff, security, food vendors etc can start making a buck again, and for longer than 17 weeks as would have been the case.Not sure why people are having a crack at the players for wanting to play 22 games. No one wants to take a 20% pay cut. And the argument of they earn more money doesnt wash with me. The mortgages, spending requirements would be all in proportion to what they earn. Take away 20% of what they earn - its going to hurt them.
Robbo really annoyed me last night, he does every night, but he went to a new level.Robbo coughing regularly the past couple of nights not helping. Geez he's a hack.
Not sure why people are having a crack at the players for wanting to play 22 games. No one wants to take a 20% pay cut. And the argument of they earn more money doesnt wash with me. The mortgages, spending requirements would be all in proportion to what they earn. Take away 20% of what they earn - its going to hurt them.
Not sure why people are having a crack at the players for wanting to play 22 games. No one wants to take a 20% pay cut. And the argument of they earn more money doesnt wash with me. The mortgages, spending requirements would be all in proportion to what they earn. Take away 20% of what they earn - its going to hurt them.
The players fought very hard to have part of their salaries tied to the revenue generated by the game. Well they won that right now they need to suck it up.They're going to have to take a hair cut; every one is. There is no way around it. This will be economically crippling for an undefined period of time; hopefully that period will be shorter rather than longer. Many people will lose their jobs; the players need to keep that in perspective.
The fact is that the normal revenue streams will not be there. Greg Swann said that playing in front of no crowds will cost the Lions around $5m for the year. When the revenue dries up you need to cut costs somewhere; everyone has gotta have some skin in the game. The players included. That is just the reality of the situation.
For the players to expect that they should be paid as if it is a normal year is at best naive, at worst selfish.