911 Truth Movement | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

911 Truth Movement

Do you think the US government should hold an independent investigation into the events surrounding


  • Total voters
    63
rosy23 said:
No I haven't really. Only what I've come across as a result of this thread. To me an apologist site I'd be interested in would give balance by including how some of the perceived facts they're challenging could be possible rather than think they have all the answers. Is that how the sites you linked to are different? If so I might check them out sometime. I have no interest in reading about lack of planes, pilot capabilities, grey windows or dead bodies. I read a statement yesterday where Boeing said the plane involved wasn't able to be flown remotely. Can't find it now unfortunately.

It seems to me some need to question for the sake of it and I don't see the benefit of that. The moon landing is another example. Next we'll be hearing the Govt blew up the shuttle...after all an undamaged journal and some live creatures survived it.

Not so much. They focus on specific claims made in the OR which they believe are blatantly wrong that are centred around their area of expertse. They discuss in detail why they object to these claims.
 
brigadiertiger said:
So in the end we are all in agreeance it was a conspiracy. :whistle

Well 2 or 3 seem to be. Hardly the weight of numbers. I think the conspiracy is a conspiracy. :hihi
 
Disco08 said:
Yeah for sure. I tried to find something on the 2002/03 controversy mentioned on that page but no luck. Any ideas?

Maybe to do with Intelligence on Iraqi WMD.
Read here
Only guessing though.

They didn't get that one right either.
 
KnightersRevenge said:
A big shout out to my homegirl PM Julia Gillard for finally killing the 911 thread. Can I get a whoop whoop?!
Seconded. Case closed. Realists 1, theorists 0 ........ :ner
 
Pffft. Questions unanswered: you guys - heaps, us - not many, if any. Resorting to insults: you guys - heaps, us - not many, if any. :)
 
KnightersRevenge said:
A big shout out to my homegirl PM Julia Gillard for finally killing the 911 thread. Can I get a whoop whoop?!

Forget September 11.....it's now September 14. Geez......7 months of spin all heading towards another toss of the coin vote.
 
Disco08 said:
Pffft. Questions unanswered: you guys - heaps, us - not many, if any. Resorting to insults: you guys - heaps, us - not many, if any. :)
Disco biting: 5 :angel:
 
SCOOP said:
Well played Disco. For the record I am in your corner.

Thanks SCOOP.

We've seen a few people say they believe this was a terrorist attack. What would be interesting to know is what exactly they base that belief on. What definitive proof do they have. Where no proof exists why are they prepared to accept an inquiry that was blatantly inadequate even according to those who oversaw it. What reason do they have to oppose a proper inquiry?

Finally there's a religious analogy worth making. Dodgy document vehemently defended despite no evidence to support it used as a platform to serve a much grander agenda. Adherents also mock any theory which dares question the dodgy document. ;D
 
Oh sorry, I thought ignoring questions was acceptable in this thread.

FWIW it was just a light-hearted comment in keeping with the mood at the time.
 
Anyone conecrned about George W. in this clip?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sm73wOuPL60