TigerForce said:[youtube=560,315]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ys41jnL2Elk[/youtube]
I hadn't seen that before.
TigerForce said:[youtube=560,315]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ys41jnL2Elk[/youtube]
Tigers of Old said::hihi Don't remember it live that's for sure.
Still remember as clear as day, being glued to the box as the gorgeous Sandra Sully explained that they believed a light plane had flown into the 1st tower but were waiting for more details to come to hand.
antman said:Thanks for missing the point
Tigers of Old said::hihi Don't remember it live that's for sure.
Still remember as clear as day, being glued to the box as the gorgeous Sandra Sully explained that they believed a light plane had flown into the 1st tower but were waiting for more details to come to hand.
Harry said:they're all tied in together. WMD's was the pretext but 911 was the conditioning event. This scared the sh!te out of the people and they accepted anything the govt threw up in the name of homeland security. "we need to bomb Iraq because they have WMD's and there could be another 911". how convenient. problem, reaction, solution. need people to think their security is threatened then you can do whatever you like, even if the pretext is exposed as a lie. "Oh our intelligence was wrong" All is forgiven because you were protecting us in the name of homeland security.
Harry said:they're all tied in together. WMD's was the pretext but 911 was the conditioning event. This scared the sh!te out of the people and they accepted anything the govt threw up in the name of homeland security. "we need to bomb Iraq because they have WMD's and there could be another 911". how convenient. problem, reaction, solution. need people to think their security is threatened then you can do whatever you like, even if the pretext is exposed as a lie. "Oh our intelligence was wrong" All is forgiven because you were protecting us in the name of homeland security.
KnightersRevenge said:Much like Disco's posts I don't disagree with much of this, I just don't buy the bit where there is a government conspiracy that created 911. That they took advantage of it legalise torture and rendition and the many atrocities perpetrated in the name of "national security" and "defending democracy" is a very real possibility.
TigerForce said:What are your thoughts on the continuous procrastination of the Khalid Sheik Mohammed trial KR?
Timothy McVeigh was killed instantly after the 1995 bombing, but this..........
KnightersRevenge said:Much like Disco's posts I don't disagree with much of this, I just don't buy the bit where there is a government conspiracy that created 911. That they took advantage of it legalise torture and rendition and the many atrocities perpetrated in the name of "national security" and "defending democracy" is a very real possibility.
antman said:The US government does not need to invent a crackpot conspiracy that involves killing thousands of their own citizens. They'll make sh!t up and invade Iraq anyway.
Harry said:so your'e kinda admitting that there was a motive, or an opportunity from 911. and it's been shown that they deliberately lied as a pretext to war. yet you find it hard to fathom they would be involved in the events of 911 based on "evidence" they produced and investigated themselves? they have form in deceiving to achieve their goals and you question why people suspect the govt was involved, or at least had some prior knowledge and let it happen?
Tigers of Old said:Once again.. Harry do you think all the people who witnessed a plane fly into the Pentagon and the firefighters who thought the building 7 would possibly fall down are liars or FBI plants?
Harry said:no. there could well have been a plane at the pentagon and I'm starting to open up to that possibility based on some more research. I'm probably at a similar point to Disco in that it is very questionable that a first time pilot could have flown the plane the way it was reported. in terms of the firefighters - I'm open to the idea they thought it would possibly fall. could be that in a time of panic and seeing building 1 and 2 fall they feared it could happen at 7. could be that communication came through that it could fall (Larry and BBC had prior knowledge - this could have filtered down). never said that firefighters were on the payroll.
Tigers of Old said:So if firefighters consider it plausible that B7 fell, then I assume you think it may be possible too?
Harry when probed there's just as many questions about the conspiracy theories as there are about the official reports, if not more so!
Seems the goal posts keep shifting.
antman said:The US government does not need to invent a crackpot conspiracy that involves killing thousands of their own citizens. They'll make sh!t up and invade Iraq anyway.
I love the way "Larry and the BBC had prior knowledge" has now become fact.Harry said:no. there could well have been a plane at the pentagon and I'm starting to open up to that possibility based on some more research. I'm probably at a similar point to Disco in that it is very questionable that a first time pilot could have flown the plane the way it was reported. in terms of the firefighters - I'm open to the idea they thought it would possibly fall. could be that in a time of panic and seeing building 1 and 2 fall they feared it could happen at 7. could be that communication came through that it could fall (Larry and BBC had prior knowledge - this could have filtered down). never said that firefighters were on the payroll.