Disco08 said:I've defined it often and clearly enough. I'm just seeing if anyone was actually paying attention.
antman said:The position you are taking is to demand other people define your position and then ask them point out what's wrong with the position they've defined for you. That's an awesomely logical stance dude.
tigergollywog said:as entertaining as it can be, this thread is becoming increasingly unbecoming. all the past tense talk suggests the protagonists are over it, yet strangely addicted.
Disco08 said:LOL. You guys think you're critical thinking realists but you can't even define the position you're being irrationally critical of. What a joke.
Disco08 said:The evidence that supports that position is clean and clear.
Disco08 said:Well close. The position is the demand for a proper inquiry. No need for emotive embellishment. The evidence that supports that position is clean and clear.
Why you think it's crap is anyone's guess.
Disco08 said:Well close. The position is the demand for a proper inquiry.
tigersnake said:Also, its crap because logically why else would truthers want an inquiry? Total *smile*. The truthers think the truth is that 9/11 was government orchestrated. You might fool yourself but you ain't fooling me.
evo said:Moreover truthers invqariably considers themselves rugged, free-thinking individuals not sucked in like us sheeple but then whine that the government wont explain the whole scenario to them.
tigertim said:Where is there position published and by whom?
Disco08 said:rosy - as a score out of 10 on scale of respect to me you score 0. You can have my resignation as any type of support to you and this community effective as of right now. I'd reply to your points individually but life's way too short.
Antman went there. I wasn't brave enough!antman said:And the hissy fits keep on coming.
Disco08 said:Too late. Respect's utmost to me and you've showed me none.
Disco08 said:Too late. Respect's utmost to me and you've showed me none.