Disco08 said:Missed the point ant.
The answer is as obvious as it gets. Googling involves a little more than typing something in and reading the first result.
rosy3/23 said:Yep, that's been made more than obvious by some on this thread. Very selective with the info used. As I said we can all use google to get the info we want to use. Doesn't matter if it's fact or fiction. We can also use it to find contradicting information. I wasn't interested in Google's answer to your question. I was interested in your answer to your question. Not overly interested admittedly, just interested from the perspective of you being keen for others to answer it.
Disco08 said:Why not?
Disco08 said:Me telling you defeats the entire purpose so sorry, I'm not going to tell you just yet.
Disco08 said:Nope. You're the oracle.
And I'm interested to see if any of you that are so supercilious towards the 911TM can even state its position. Me telling you defeats the entire purpose so sorry, I'm not going to tell you just yet.
tigergollywog said:Wikipedia - Truther: middle aged man who bought the now defunct melbourne tabloid paper 'The Truth', which featured a topless girl on page 3 and carried such headlines as 'Clinton King uses 110km/hr tail wind and thermite boot inserts to roost ball 25 meters'
BTW, I love this thread, although it should be called Disco V The World.
rosy3/23 said:Because I see no purpose in confidential, sensitive, high risk security issues being explained to people in the street and/or potential enemies.
who's on first?Disco08 said:Is what it?
tigergollywog said:this is gettingpretty weird.weirder
Disco08 said:It's a one sentence answer which I must have stated ten times on this thread. How hard can it be?
Where you trying to tell me that entire page represented the "TP" tim or just part of it?
No sh!t. How these guys can't answer such a simple question whilst having such strong opinions is beyond bizarre.
Disco08 said:No sh!t. How these guys can't answer such a simple question whilst having such strong opinions is beyond bizarre.
Disco08 said:It's a one sentence answer which I must have stated ten times on this thread. How hard can it be?
Where you trying to tell me that entire page represented the "TP" tim or just part of it?
Panthera tigris FC said:Is this the same Disco who fought on the side of rational thought on various other threads in this forum?
Return him at once!
Taking ONE of your positions on this thread (there have been many, despite your repeated protestation and derision) and claiming it as the TRUE position is like some bizarre shell game.
If the position of the truthers is to raise doubt about the minutiae of 9/11 (an insanely complex series of events, bound to contain coincidences and rare occurences) then that is the only consistent position I have seen you take....and, yes, I have read every single post on this thread :-\.
Disco08 said:If you've read every post in this thread and can't see the actual position I've taken (what you just posted isn't it) you haven't read closely enough because I've stated it repeatedly and clearly.
The fact this exercise is like puling teeth is the perfect reflection of this thread. You guys claim the intellectual high ground on a constant basis but back it up with *smile* all.
Panthera tigris FC said:Is this the same Disco who fought on the side of rational thought on various other threads in this forum?
Return him at once!