Panthera tigris FC said:I dispute it to the extent that they would have to have some perceived benefit from the undertaking. How did they benefit from 9/11, remembering that they are killing thousands of US citizens on US soil to achieve this aim?
I thought Zeitgeist explained quite well why it benefits the US to be perpetually at war, although I can't explain it myself properly. I think they also showed similarities between this and the circumstances behind the US joining other wars. Michael Moore's doco also put forward some compelling reasoning IIRC.
Panthera tigris FC said:Consensus? By experts on a 9/11 conspiracy? Really?
No, I didn't say that. The consensuses I'm referring to are where experts seem to collectively dispute the findings of the US commission report into the facts surrounding the events of 9/11.
Another compelling point is that the US government and FBI, unable to detect these hijackers and stop them flying planes into their most valuable airspace and ultimately buildings killing thousands of people, suddenly knew absolutely everything there was to know about them 2 days later. There was so much information forthcoming that every major newspaper in the western world was jammed with pictures, details, plots, movements, transactions etc. Don't you think that's more than a little curious?