Agreed, no link between this and stalking creeps.Baloo said:We had to change our home number once, to stop abusive anonymous calls, but that's not what these DJs did.
Agreed, no link between this and stalking creeps.Baloo said:We had to change our home number once, to stop abusive anonymous calls, but that's not what these DJs did.
Elmer said:Clearly struck a cord with you Rosy but fact remains pranks like this happen all the time.
Elmer said:Kate Middleton sick with baby is number one news in UK and big globally, it was always going to attract this sort of unwanted attention.
Elmer said:The Sun in the UK is classless but also the No 1 selling paper/rag; happy for them to be classed lowlife;
Elmer said:Agreed, no link between this and stalking creeps.
Tommo37 said:4. If a radio or television show is conducting a prank, wouldn't they have to tell the person/people after it's happened that they have been the subject of a prank.
The always claim is based on a being a massive 'Royal' news story, fairly transparent I would have thought.rosy23 said:What on earth do you base that claim "always" claim on? What's the precedence for a royal family member being sick with their baby experiencing this kind of prank? If 2Day FM didn't do it how do you know that sort of unwanted attention would still have occurred?
That's funny Elmer. I'll remember you've given your blessing if I feel the need to post about the UK Sun. I happen to think the radio station and djs were classless in this instance too though. Without the benefit of the above clarification I took your protest on board and moved the discussion to another thread. It's a very low act no matter what the Lowlife of the Week thread heading says. Maybe the title of the thread could be changed to Instigators of Low Acts but people would still judge participation based on their own criteria.
Baloo said:We had to change our home number once, to stop abusive anonymous calls, but that's not what these DJs did.
Elmer said:The always claim is based on a being a massive 'Royal' news story, fairly transparent I would have thought.
Elmer said:I wasn't saying you need my blessing but good on you for taking that OTT personal leap. I was merely saying that no-one would say The Sun isn't lowlife.
TigerForce said:Who knows on how the person feels.
rosy23 said::clapping Fact is we can't know what crosses others have to bear or the negative affect our actions could potentially have on them.
I reckon it's a safe bet, even though plenty seem to condone such behaviour, that the parties involved won't ever repeat this kind of stunt again. Could be a lesson learned the hard way that, even though it might be water off a duck's back to some, not everyone is programmed to cope with being harassed, humiliated, ridiculed or publicly embarrassed. Very, very sad situation.
Baloo said:Don't disagree, but if you ban them then the candid camera shows need to be banned too.
Tommo37 said:1. I find it hard to believe that the royals don't have their own direct phone line into the hospital.
The evidence is it happened. In my 10 years living in the UK there are/were numerous 'gotcha' moments every year that happen to the Royals in one form or another. If you want physical evidence then surf the net.rosy23 said:There is no evidence at all that the situation was "always going to attract this sort of unwanted attention". Unwanted attention no doubt but prank phone calls of this kind? No evidence to support that at all.
Yep and you prefaced that by saying they were classless. I judge 2Day FM's actions as classless too. Blessing or not you were saying one belonged on the lowlife thread and one didn't. Seeing it was my post being protested about I was happy to split it. Would probably have left it if another poster had chosen to post it on this thread though. I think it was an extremely low act but accept we all have our own standards and criteria on how we judge these things.
Chiang Mai Tiger said:After this tragedy they should be:
[youtube=560,315]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJhr_MYO_rE[/youtube]
Elmer said:Your post wasn't protested, I voiced an opinion that I disagreed as did others. It was there for discussion no? However obviously an emotive topic as you ended up paying the man rather than the ball/topic.
rosy23 said:If the 2Day FM didnt pull that prank this awful situation wouldn't be an issue. Very unfortunate that they did.