-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
2023 PRE Phantom Draft
- Thread starter toothless
- Start date
Thanks, All good, I just didnt want Tigertimmy to be the only one to f up.
Dees pick Luke Lloyd.
Gone the pure footballer here for Fremantle
Welcome aboard Koen Sanchez
Its a shame a great name in Koen will forever be replaced with Dirty !
Welcome aboard Koen Sanchez
Its a shame a great name in Koen will forever be replaced with Dirty !
Dammit, he was my next pick for the Dogs. Nearly picked him for Richmond.
I almost picked Jack Cocking here but figured he would be more suited to a career in porn
- Mar 6, 2004
- 2,595
- 1,960
- 59
Dogs pick Phoenix Gothard, 178cm speedy, skillful, smart, small forward. Great value here. Can't believe Freo went for Callinan and Dirty Sanchez ahead of him, frankly.
Back to you, @Sammy Cougar , although do you have room for another pick?
Back to you, @Sammy Cougar , although do you have room for another pick?
He was next on my list but thought the go home factor was too great.
Besides, I dont like footballers with boring names like Phoenix & Gothard
@toothless we need a ruling as to whether clubs can exceed the number of picks you've allotted them in the OP. My vote is no.
- Mar 6, 2004
- 2,595
- 1,960
- 59
- Mar 6, 2004
- 2,595
- 1,960
- 59
Yeah probably easiest, but would be maybe more interesting if you let clubs argue their case for taking one extra? If a club has a heap of picks and thinks theres values and could delist another player. It would only be one extra, if a club is forecast to take 3, they might take 4 for example. Most clubs wouldn't, Saints are out. But whatever you reckon.
