you obviously lack the nuance to understand what he really meant.Carter called for a rebuild a couple of weeks back so back us in for the flag boys
EVERY team drops off with 2 or 3 critical injuries.We are entirely dependent on fitness. Our best 22 is as good as (or better than) anyone's.
But we drop off exponentially with 2 or 3 critical injuries. Vlas and Grimes are two of those, and haven't been together all year (bar one game -that we won by 109 points).
I just think we're more dependent on our stars. Our finals performers are dynasty players.EVERY team drops off with 2 or 3 critical injuries.
Go dees have not been tested on this front. Their age profile means soft tissue / wear and tear injuries are less likely.
Carlton with Cripps and Curnow fit another good example.
Richmond was brilliantly resillient in 19/20 to squeak into top 4 - and we generally had our best team available in the finals (graham in 19 gf and Vlaustin for most of 20 gf and soldo about it)
Hopefully we get a good run - Cotchin and prestias calves/hammies, lamberts groin and if young uns can still be going deep in season (and no horrific bad luck ACL/kidney/broken bones) will be the key. Reckon our best is pretty pretty good - and I can barely curb my enthusiasm.
I must say I'm enjoying listening to Nathan Buckley's football analysis. Not just because he's said some positive stuff on us today but the way he explains things for nuff nuffs like myself is pretty enlightening.
Like many others on here, I've been pretty critical of him over the years but I put that down to my absolute hatred of the pies and not the man himself!
Anyway, I've time stamped the attached and I think Bucks reckons we can march on a little longer.
Nathan Buckley in the studio (10.5.22)
Nathan Buckley joined Gerard in the studio to talk about David Noble's situation with players, and to outline the things senior coaches must consider when managing their players. He also detailed the times he lost players, and delivered sprays, and also chatted about the interesting situation at...player.whooshkaa.com
Agree to disagree. Which other team has had 2 or 3 of their top end talent out at the same time and done really well? Dusty and Prestia are probably the top 2 in our team - although lynch making a case with his last 2 weeks.I just think we're more dependent on our stars. Our finals performers are dynasty players.
You know, unless we drop them for Cumberland for some reason.
Agree to disagree. Which other team has had 2 or 3 of their top end talent out at the same time and done really well? Dusty and Prestia are probably the top 2 in our team - although lynch making a case with his last 2 weeks.
Every team depends on their stars and if they have none they are norf. (Well they lost their best player in Cunnington who is A grade to me to cancer)
Next 3 rounds for
RICH. STK. SYD. GEEL. CARL
Haw Geel ESS* Stk. GWS*
ess Adel*. Carl*. Port Syd
Syd*. Nth Rich Adel. Coll
??????Next 3 rounds for
RICH. STK. SYD. GEEL. CARL
Haw Geel ESS* Stk. GWS*
ess Adel*. Carl*. Port Syd
Syd*. Nth Rich Adel. Coll
Even more???????8 point games
Stk v Geel
SYD v Carl & rich
Don’t forget the diabolical last qtr v the saintsThat last quarter to Carlton
Reverse that and we are 5th and they are 8th.
A bit awkward but you’ve got to look at the games vertically eg. Rich vs Haw, Ess, Syd.??????
Yeah figured that bit out later when I went back through it n concentrated really hard. Still not sure about all those eight point games though. Been following footy for a hell of a long time n unless they changed some rules again, while I wasn't looking, there's only been four point games not eight.A bit awkward but you’ve got to look at the games vertically eg. Rich vs Haw, Ess, Syd.