That would be nice. Greene gets off. Scratches Stephenson's eyes out in the first quarter. GWS win by less than a goal. Eddie's head explodes. Greene out for a year.
Its a delicious scenario.
That would be nice. Greene gets off. Scratches Stephenson's eyes out in the first quarter. GWS win by less than a goal. Eddie's head explodes. Greene out for a year.
I caught a bit of D King on SEN today saying he believes the Cats can say because he was moving and only about 60 metres from the ball that he was in the play ...ridiculous. Bit like Cornes he likes saying stupid things so people talk about him.
I can’t criticise that critique. I also thought last week’s effort by Greene was beyond the pail and warranted suspension.I'm conflicted by this one. I didn't think this act was as bad as last week (nor does it warrant suspension), but I thought he should have been suspended last week, and he got off. Weird.
But agree, whatever works best to screw up Collingwood's game I'm down for.
Agree TOO, why the comparison? It is non existent.Makes me larf so hard those salty Cats fans comparing Tomahack's off ball coward hit to Cotch's in play bump in 2017.
I mean really???
They’re only taking the lead of Dangerfield who had the same argument. I hate those salty bastardsMakes me larf so hard those salty Cats fans comparing Tomahack's off ball coward hit to Cotch's in play bump in 2017.
I mean really???
Did Dangerfield get fined yet?
AFL rule is you can’t talk about a report before the verdict.
Or did they just sweep that under the carpet
Did Dangerfield get fined yet?
AFL rule is you can’t talk about a report before the verdict.
Or did they just sweep that under the carpet
I can’t criticise that critique. I also thought last week’s effort by Greene was beyond the pale and warranted suspension.
Much as I wouldn't mind Greene harassing some Collingwood players, there is no way he should get off.
DS
All good, waiting. It was very clever use of reverse psychology.Got the Hawkins one wrong.
Lets see if i get the Toby one right.....