Obviously we would prefer all the above but want is the most importance. For me we need skills
All of the above as in the modern game one is insufficient. You may survive with two.
Agree with this "Obviously we do need quick, smart, tough, competitive footballers, who can kick."jarryd Okley Nicholls had speed
ben Lennon had skills
Mark Neeld had footy IQ.
Obviously we do need quick, smart, tough, competitive footballers, who can kick.
sorry to spoil the ternary, but I simply can't separate em.
But, in the spirit of participation, and given we are allegedly shopping around our last few quick players,
ill say speed.
Where Connor Menadue these days?A skilled pacy player should be the target.
This is right. A high footy iq is a must, combine that with skill and you’ve got a player. Dusty had all 3. Cotchin and Jack weren’t quick, but they were smart and knew how to use the ball.All of the above as in the modern game one is insufficient. You may survive with two.
jarryd Okley Nicholls had speed
ben Lennon had skills
Mark Neeld had footy IQ.
There’s a name I haven’t heard in a long time.Where Connor Menadue these days?
Yep, skills. If you’ve got skilled players across the park who can deliver the ball to a teammate (and not over their head, or 5 metres in front of them) it can make you look fast.
Agreed David. Handballing to stationary players OR players with their backs to goals who then have to slow things down by navigating their way around to turn to face goals is frustrating. You see Hawthorn who handball forward to guys facing forward who can continue running towards goals and that makes them be a speedy team.Less worried about 5 metres in front of them, the way we pass to stationary players drives me crazy. We also need players who can make 5m of space and run fast enough to receive the ball.
Yep, we have a lot of needs.
DS