Re the question of Gibs and best 22 or starting 18?
My simple view from the outer is you select your team both for the now and for tomorrow and if you’re good enough you do it simultaneously. We need to get games into our younger emerging stars even if they are not strictly best 22 right now.
So right now I agree with Brodders comment below that Tarrant is perhaps the better player but I would still pick a fit Gibs over Tarrant so we get him to 50 games asap (maybe matchups dependent).
Perhaps academic right now depending on how long Gibs has off.
My simple view from the outer is you select your team both for the now and for tomorrow and if you’re good enough you do it simultaneously. We need to get games into our younger emerging stars even if they are not strictly best 22 right now.
So right now I agree with Brodders comment below that Tarrant is perhaps the better player but I would still pick a fit Gibs over Tarrant so we get him to 50 games asap (maybe matchups dependent).
Perhaps academic right now depending on how long Gibs has off.
I am pretty confident, injury permitting, our starting back 7 will be Tarrant, Balta, Grimes, Broad, Vlastuin, Rioli & Baker. The only queries I have are Balta- maybe they will try him forward again, and likewise Baker. I hope not for both, especially Baker.
As excited as I am in his potential, and his performance, I am not sure where Gibcus fits, even when fit. He is too good for the VFL, but probably doesnt crack our best backline. He could be the 3rd tall forward with the view to take over as no2 from Jack when he retires, but I reckon our 3rd forward needs to ruck, and I dont know that is the best thing for Gibcus at this stage of his career.