Talking Politics | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Talking Politics

Your concerns over the ethics of this bloke didn't stop you signing on though.

It wasn't a bloke, it was a company. The family trust wasn't the entity that advertised the job role. Only when I signed the formal contract did I see the family trust named as the legal entity I was working for. I thought it was odd but didn't think too much of it at the time.

They paid me my money and stayed with them about 6 months, so I guess if I was that concerned I should have quit. I would say though that I wasn't ripping off the government and by extension the tax payer, they were. If they were.

Do you remember the big contractor body shop that was ripping off the government to the tune of 165 million dollars by paying no tax on behalf of their employees?


I don't blame the contractors who had their payrolls processed with tax skimmed through them. They thought they were paying their tax. I paid my tax.

Anyway, I've worked for the banks, I've worked for the oil companies, I've worked for the energy retailers. You could argue all of these guys are evil :cool:
 
Last edited:
Virtually every adult Australian is a beneficiary by of a tax advantaged trust. That's how super works. And while the rules are the same for all the richer you are the bigger the advantage.

True 22. And when you are rich you can split incomes and pay members of your own family to avoid tax, or you can rort the tax imputation credits thing, or you can negatively gear your investment properties, or run systems of shell companies to minimise tax, so on and so forth.

That's what people who pay their full share of tax object to I think.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
I also recall at the time of the last election the LNP came out with this statement that the reason why they wouldn't change anything related to negative gearing was that many middle income earners had investment properties. I live in the Treasurer's electorate so I wrote to him and said that if that was the case then leave negative gearing in place but cap the level of borrowing on which interest can be deducted, say at $500,000 or something like that and phase it in . By doing that it would only be the large investors with multiple negatively geared properties or very valuable ones who would be effected.
No answer
CGT rules, negative gearing and cash refunds of franking credits contribute to increasing valuation of property and share assets in Australia and that hurts the lower and middle income people of Australia as well.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
The middle/low income earnings owning property stats is misleading. It's not difficult to claim you are a low or middle income earner when you negatively gear.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
The middle/low income earnings owning property stats is misleading. It's not difficult to claim you are a low or middle income earner when you negatively gear.
There is also the variable of just what, or how much, a middle income earner makes, and how it is decided.
 
Little Scotty and cohorts have apparently come out saying if journos, etc, continue to use the term 'liar' or 'lies' when referring to the PM that 'action' will be taken against them'.
What?
Seems like they want to tie up objectors in legal motions, probably the only way to keep them quiet.
Gets more like a dictatorship by the day.

I watched 'The Trial Of The Chicago 7' the other night and it seemed quite contemporary...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Little Scotty and cohorts have apparently come out saying if journos, etc, continue to use the term 'liar' or 'lies' when referring to the PM that 'action' will be taken against them'.
What?
Seems like they want to tie up objectors in legal motions, probably the only way to keep them quiet.
Gets more like a dictatorship by the day.

I watched 'The Trial Of The Chicago 7' the other night and it seemed quite contemporary...

It can't be good when it's hard to tell the difference between reality and satire, can it?


 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
It can't be good when it's hard to tell the difference between reality and satire, can it?



1m5k7r.jpg
 
It can't be good when it's hard to tell the difference between reality and satire, can it?


I am really not sure how anyone could vote for a government led by Morrison. and our deputy PM Barnaby Joyce.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I am really not sure how anyone could vote for a government led by Morrison. and our deputy PM Barnaby Joyce.
Very easy. I reckon the average Australian is probably fairly disengaged with politics and it only becomes interesting during election time for them.

The vocal minority have pretty much decided how they are going to vote already. The parties wont be targeting the vocal minority with their election pledges and slogans
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users