I think you are not allowed multiple misses during a dynasty. Four out of four works, so does 3 out of three or even 3 out of 4.
Three out of five does not qualify, in my opinion.
I’m not sure how Geelong can claim a dynasty with 3 flags between 2007 and 2011 when Hawthorn claimed four between 2008 and 2015. There is no such thing as a Co-dynasty.
It seems to divide neutrals. Some are scathing about it as a spectacle. Not sure how much of it is down to not getting the results they want (i.e. Richmond losing).Tigsrs play the best looking footy.
Its just enjoyable to watch.
I agree with this 100%. I rate our era very highly as we built this team in an era of extremely compromised drafts; GCS and GWS were taking the cream of the early picks in drafts from 2010 - 2014 or thereabouts. It's also why, with respect, I downgrade Hawthorn's threepeat. They had built that list prior to the GCS and GWS compromised draft era. Then they topped up with recruits and free agents from other clubs; Gunston, Frawley, Lake, Burgoyne etc. It was very hard for other clubs to catch them in that compromised draft era.The ‘built the team through compromised drafts’ factor has been understated and adds value to our 3. It’s hard to quantify the affect but I think it’s huge, probably almost on par with brizzies away finals and travel.
#and yes spirit of jack - so is the 18 team competition
Here is an interesting one. Carlton won in 68, 70 and 72. Three times in five years.
Richmond won in 67, 69, 73 and 74. Four Premierships which bookend Carlton’s three.
I don’t think either is a Dynasty. Both teams allowed too many to slip through their hands. And if 3 out of 5 doesn’t qualify here then it doesn’t qualify for Geelong in 07,09 and 11.
It is a rule. You are only allowed to drop one.
the biggest dynasty of all is Melbourne in the 50s. Five out of six. Only dropped one.
There is a train of thought that says a good Grand Final is one where the result is close and in dispute to the last kick. what percentage of the viewing audience turn the TV off when the game is decided? Chances are, it is a significant number.It seems to divide neutrals. Some are scathing about it as a spectacle. Not sure how much of it is down to not getting the results they want (i.e. Richmond losing).
Coaches tend to love stoppage-based footy because it gives them a semblance of control. I don't understand how an impartial spectator could prefer stoppage footy over our brand.
Hardwick has become the Bart Cummings of football with his ability to get the team to peak on the big day. Although 2020 wasn't his best effort, he was off by about an hour.The skill and power that Richmond have displayed in the last few Grand Finals is awesome and they have played some of the most contested football seen in years. It is just bad fir the audience when they win all the contests. They are supposed to split them.
If Carlton had won in 71, would that have been a double dynasty? It would have been four flags each for two teams over eight years.I reckon the tigers 60s/70s IS a dynasty
and Carltons ISNT.
I dont think Melbournes qualify either.
In fact, I think only Richmond can truly be dynastical
Question TOTTY:
Can you have a double dynasty, similar to splitting a pair of Aces when playing Pontoon?
Obviously I'm biased but I rate our dynasty higher than Hawthorn's or Geelong's. Probably just a shade behind Brisbane at this stage.
That would be beautifulThis Richmond Dynasty has a fair way to go.
I think it lasts as long as Dusty's career, which I expect has 5 or 6 years to run
If Carlton had won in 71, would that have been a double dynasty? It would have been four flags each for two teams over eight years.
personally, I think it would have been an act of terrorism. Two evil empires pooling their resources to terrorise the neighbourhood.
Dustany or Dimmasty...?Lets call 17-20 The First Dusty Dynasty,
Then we'll have a true fairy tale ending when he's carried off after his last game in a GF with his 6th NormThis Richmond Dynasty has a fair way to go.
I think it lasts as long as Dusty's career, which I expect has 5 or 6 years to run
And his teammates can give him a proper sendoff with all their Premiership Medals neatly tucked into their jumpers.Then we'll have a true fairy tale ending when he's carried off after his last game in a GF with his 6th Norm
I've never really cared for neutrals.It seems to divide neutrals. Some are scathing about it as a spectacle. Not sure how much of it is down to not getting the results they want (i.e. Richmond losing).
Coaches tend to love stoppage-based footy because it gives them a semblance of control. I don't understand how an impartial spectator could prefer stoppage footy over our brand.
2020 held some interest for the neutral at three quarter time and maybe for another 15 minutes or so if you had no idea what was happening but, ultimately, it did not deliver the win on the final kick of the game.
Just to be clear. .... is that with or without strides?If I feel like not wearing my embossed bling tiger jocks to a grand final, I will