No, that's the Hawthorn sponsorship(cough : ) rort.jb03 said:Is it possible that compensation will be paid but not through the court system. Hasn't Lennon set up a fund in Tassie?
Liverpool said:Tiger74,
If their evidence is flimsy and I assume they would need this evidence to benefit from a compo fund.....then that doesn't make sense why they would lobby for a compo fund.
So obviously the "sorry" apology had to have some weight for them to have access to a compo fund.
Then why wouldn't this evidence and 'sorry' carry the same weight in a court of law for individual compo cases, as it would for them to have access to money in a compo fund?
The Dodson's are genuine, reasonable and intelligent leaders........ as are Noel Pearson and Warren Mundine. They deserve to be listened to and respected. We need to give these men every bit of support and encouragement to help them help their own people.dukeos said:How about this quote from Patrick Dodson.
"To those who participated in the removal process and who have looked into their own hearts and found that their intentions were good, I thank you for the care and the love that you showed to those in need. But to those whose intent was malign and motivations racist, your actions have now been exposed and repudiated"
That is very cool. In the same article, there was a picture of an Aboriginal woman, with THANKS printed accross the front. All positive reactions to the Sorry speach.
From an article in Time Magazine Feb 25 2008.
http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/no-excuse-for-violence-says-aboriginal-leader/2005/11/22/1132421665523.htmlThe indigenous leader and ALP vice-president, Warren Mundine, has rebuked Aboriginal men for the horrific level of domestic violence in many communities.
He said bashing women was not part of traditional Aboriginal culture, and he was tired of the excuses men made for their behaviour, including blaming alcohol, and problems at home.
"I'm tired of hearing Aboriginal men say they bashed their wife because white fellows took our country," he said yesterday. "Now that really [teaches] the white fellows a lesson."
Mr Mundine is one of dozens of prominent men to be appointed "ambassadors" by UNIFEM, the UN development fund for women, in a campaign to eliminate violence against women. Culminating in White Ribbon Day on Friday, the campaign has featured controversial TV advertising, and is part of the biggest effort by men across the world, in partnership with women, to end domestic violence. Speaking at an event attended by the rugby league players Benji Marshall, Dene Halatau, and Robbie Farrah, Mr Mundine called on Aboriginal men to "stand up and make a difference"
He said he was part of a community where the statistics for domestic violence were "the worst of the worst", with women in some Queensland Aboriginal communities at 24 times the average risk of being raped.
A recent survey of 6600 women by the Australian Institute of Criminology found 10 per cent of Australian women had experienced male physical or sexual violence the previous year, and almost 60 per cent had experienced it over their life-time. A study last year by VicHealth found that for women younger than 45, violence contributed more to their poor health and death than factors such as smoking and obesity
Hayfever said:The Dodson's are genuine, reasonable and intelligent leaders........ as are Noel Pearson and Warren Mundine. They deserve to be listened to and respected. We need to give these men every bit of support and encouragement to help them help their own people.
I would not give two bob for the blonde bombshell Michael Mansell or Geoff Clark though. They do the cause of indigenous people far more harm than good.
Liver's and others might like to read this quote from Warren Mundine a couple of years ago:-
http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/no-excuse-for-violence-says-aboriginal-leader/2005/11/22/1132421665523.html
Liverpool said:I hope Rudd doesn't change the intervention order that Howard introduced too much....and if the likes of Mundine and Brough can get more involved, then maybe, MAYBE, the Aboriginal race can get somewhere.
The key is to aim for the younger generation though...try and influence them while they are young enough to absorb what is going to help them and what is not. Get them into school and educate them...that would be a great start.
dukeos said:Hey Livers, a litle optimism? Good to see. I think that saying Sorry is making ripples of good vibes on all sides of the debate.
Liverpool said:I hope Rudd doesn't change the intervention order that Howard introduced too much....and if the likes of Mundine and Brough can get more involved, then maybe, MAYBE, the Aboriginal race can get somewhere.
The key is to aim for the younger generation though...try and influence them while they are young enough to absorb what is going to help them and what is not. Get them into school and educate them...that would be a great start.
glantone said:In the article you posted, the prick who bashed the old lady was an indigenous aussie who in my book got off absurdly lightly. What's your point in regards to Kev's apology speech?
If he was a disadvantaged homeless white guy (and I hazard to guess there are plenty of them checking-in to the courts each day) and the old lady was an indigenous aussie, would that in some way reinforce Kev’s apology for past state sponsored repression and abuse? None the less, as you did make that post can you identify what relevant point you were making to ‘Kev’s apology speech’ in selecting that particular article to post?
Panthera tigris FC said:This is appropriate for any of the forums in this part of PRE
Panthera tigris FC said:This is appropriate for any of the forums in this part of PRE
Tiger74 said:This is out of date. Liverpool came up with quotes from Bolta to prove he was right all along, so the stick figure man was able to finally go to bed.
Liverpool said:I don't need Bolt to prove I am right on this....I've said all along it was about money and I've said all along that hounding the Government to say 'sorry' was all about getting leverage to go to court.
Why else would we all of a sudden have a glut of compo cases as soon as 'sorry' is muttered?
A strange coincidence, I think not.
Tiger74 said:Two things mate.
Firstly I was making a joke at your expense, please don't bring issues into it :hihi
Secondly, everything you are saying about the cases is irrelevant. ONLY ONE HAS SUCCEEDED!!!!
Look at Mabo. Everyone freaked out, people were gunna lose their backyards, and the world was generally going to end. What happened? The burden of proof was pretty full on, and the vast majority of cases failed. Who cares if they fail, its only if they succeed that they have an effect.
Stop tilting at windmills Don, there are bigger issues out there to be concerned with (like how we get the bloody ball effectively into our forward 50)
Liverpool said:Firstly....who is paying for the legal fees and court costs to see if they succeed or not?
Secondly...the burden of proof MAY be pretty full on, but as we have seen with the legal system and Aborigines over the past 6-12 months in particular, it is the age of the 'Aboriginal Love-In' and any facts, evidence, and proof that should be looked at and treated in a methodical and analytical way is simply being put aside in favour of moralistic, feel-good, ego-driven agendas. You only need to look at examples like the granny-basher and what happened at Aurukun to see what the legal system is like these days. Times have changed a lot since Mabo mate.
Finally....and I'll say it again...ZERO cases have succeeded.
The basis of the stolen generation is that people were removed due to their race and laws at the time allowing this to happen. Trevorrow was removed in a state and at a time when there was NO such law, and therefore he cannot be part of a stolen generation. That is why he received compo based on facts and evidence and didn't rely on 'sorry' being muttered before taking legal action. If a whole generation of people were removed the same as Trevorrow, the courts would already be full of claimants, but they were not.
They were not full because there are no facts, evidence, and proof to back up this myth and why the Government for so long have been hounded into this phoney apology to provide such leverage.
Of course now they have this apology, we are seeing mass claimants come forward.
Tiger74 said:You correct me by saying zero cases have succeeded instead of one, and this is your proof the sky is falling?? ???