That was a real head scratcher. He got hands on it ffs!
That was a real head scratcher. He got hands on it ffs!
That's what jack was saying when demonstrating with the umpire.That was a real head scratcher. He got hands on it ffs!
He didn’t remonstrate because you cant explain yourself anymore.That's what jack was saying when demonstrating with the umpire.
He pointed to his hands, but then took it on the chin. Terrible call. Completely missed by the commentators, as usual.That's what jack was saying when demonstrating with the umpire.
Surprised he didn’t get 50m for talking to the umpireThat's what jack was saying when demonstrating with the umpire.
That was a March rule, it's April now ...Surprised he didn’t get 50m for talking to the umpire
To be fair, I think the maggot thought that at Riewoldt’s age, it was unrealistic of him to get that high off the ground
Was it the same one who wished him good luck when he says he was going to kick a torp goal after the 3 quarter time siren.To be fair, I think the maggot thought that at Riewoldt’s age, it was unrealistic of him to get that high off the ground
Probably not. He would have said it was an unrealistic attempt and called the end of the quarter and taken the ball off himWas it the same one who wished him good luck when he says he was going to kick a torp goal after the 3 quarter time siren.
someone does an "expected score" based on where shots are taken from. grain of salt and all, but the "expected score" had us winning by 3 points.
it was noticeable watching the game, a lot of their shots were from 40-50 out an angle, that heavily contributed to their inaccuracy.
They are and should be called throwsIf that’s the case then a fair few of Edwards ‘handballs’ would have been called throws.
The AFL app has a really good graphic that shows where shots are taken from.
They had 21 shots at goal and had 5 either touched or rushed. So they actually kicked 7.14 from their 21 shots (7.19 for the game).
Of those 21, only 7 were taken in the area of the ground you really want to kick from, centre of the ground between those roughly 45 degree angles coming out of the goal. They kicked 1 from outside 50 and 15 from the pocket. Contra that with us, and that same area (the 45 - ie the corridor) we had 15 of our 23 shots (we had 1 rushed which adds to the 24 scoring shots we had in total).
15 vs 7 kicks from inside the corridor compared to the dogs having 15 from the pocket compared to us having only 7 from the pocket. Most media pundits seem too stupid to mention this, they just say something like the numbskulls they are that "if they'd kicked better they'd have won". How about kicking into the corridor where it is much easier to kick goals from.
They did the same against the Swans. 10 in the pocket compared to 3. 6 either rushed or touched compared to 2 for the Swans. Thats the running pattern, not that they kick poorly, its that they kick from much harder areas to kick goals.
Great insight posh....thanks!The AFL app has a really good graphic that shows where shots are taken from.
They had 21 shots at goal and had 5 either touched or rushed. So they actually kicked 7.14 from their 21 shots (7.19 for the game).
Of those 21, only 7 were taken in the area of the ground you really want to kick from, centre of the ground between those roughly 45 degree angles coming out of the goal. They kicked 1 from outside 50 and 15 from the pocket. Contra that with us, and that same area (the 45 - ie the corridor) we had 15 of our 23 shots (we had 1 rushed which adds to the 24 scoring shots we had in total).
15 vs 7 kicks from inside the corridor compared to the dogs having 15 from the pocket compared to us having only 7 from the pocket. Most media pundits seem too stupid to mention this, they just say something like the numbskulls they are that "if they'd kicked better they'd have won". How about kicking into the corridor where it is much easier to kick goals from.
They did the same against the Swans. 10 in the pocket compared to 3. 6 either rushed or touched compared to 2 for the Swans. Thats the running pattern, not that they kick poorly, its that they kick from much harder areas to kick goals.