Well I am going against the grain here. I reckon Christian got the interpretation right, but two weeks is too light.
Reid knew exactly what he was doing, tried to make it look innocent, and got him in the head. I would suggest deliberately, although that is probably going a little to far on the evidence. I agree with Watson, 4 weeks for mine.
Dangerfield can at least argue the ball was in play between himself and Kelly. That is up until just before contact the ball was between himself and the opposition player. Same as the Vlastuin hit. That said I thought both clearly deserved to earn Dangerfield a 3-4 week rest. Dangerfield was incredibly lucky for mine with the Vlas one.
Despite the fact that the ball was nearby, Fyfe was in no position to get the ball or even influence the play at the time he got hit. He had not idea Reid was there as he was focused on the footy. He cops a whack to the head, and he was concussed by it.
And the suggestion Reid was pushed in to it by the Dockers player is farcical. Watch it in slow motion if you can, he barely touches him at all.
The question we need to consider is this. What if that was a Tiger getting hit by Reid. We'd bay for his blood. And if it was a Tiger dishing one out like that, I reckon the majority of us would think 'gee mate, you are in trouble here'.