Max said:Was sitting in the MCC and heard a teenager call him a Jihadist, I had a stern word at him but I couldn't believe that it still happens in this day and age (must be my naivety).
According to http://www.aboutjihad.com/ (a pro-Muslim site) the definition of Jihad is as follows:
Jihad: means "struggle" and "strive" against evil thoughts, evil action and aggression against a person, family, society or country. Jihad may be a "justifiable war", borrowing the Christian term.
Chances are he'd flattered to be called a 'Jihadist', the negative connotations of that word being largely a western construct. The fact is all practicing Muslims are 'Jihadists', often just differing in terms of means to the end. To some the struggle is personal in how they conduct their daily lives, others join organisations and pressure groups to effect 'positive' change, whilst others resort to terrorism. Of course having said that if Islamic law is imposed via the ballot box rather than through the barrel of the gun it doesn't make it any less repulsive or repugnant or reactionary.
Either way we'd be utterly stuffed, but what I'm saying is a Jihadist is not by definition a terrorist. Calling Houli a downhill skier and squib (which he is) I think he would have found far more offensive