They never pay those. (Unless you're Richo in 1996!)Ablett goal in the 1st should have been overturned.
It wasn't touched but Henderson turned his back on the play and impeded Grimes.
Free kick.
They never pay those. (Unless you're Richo in 1996!)Ablett goal in the 1st should have been overturned.
It wasn't touched but Henderson turned his back on the play and impeded Grimes.
Free kick.
They never pay those. (Unless you're Richo in 1996!)
True. When I say pay every free, I mean the blatant ones (holding the man, throwing the ball) not incidental contact. My issue is with the license to cheat 'let it go' gives players. Punish the blokes who are deliberately cheating.Exactly. It's not as simple as pay every free all the time. The game would be unwatchable if it were.
Herd Razor banging on on SEN about being sensible and let common sense prevail when players may not have heard who had the free and it's what his coaches always tell them, then he did that! As you say, technically correct, but seriously.Even if the Clangerfield 50m penalty was technically correct (ball not delivered to the free kick recipient) - how on earth was Lynch not entitled to a 50m penalty when he was having a shot from about 50m out and a Geelong player clearly encroached “the area”?
Agree 100%.Try a fun game for yourself.
Freeze frame any midfield contest in a game of footy, and count the free kicks.
You'll invariably find a hold of the arm, a tug of the jumper, a block, or a push.
If you play back any pack mark in slow mo, you'll find blocks, holding, high contact, and finger tips touching the ball before it gets marked.
Don't get me started on Ruck contests. Every single Ruck contest either has every free or none. And they seem to always get that backwards.
Most players kicking out run 15 metres without bouncing, in fact, most players who go on blistering runs outstrip their 15 metres without bouncing.
Some of Edwards' greatest quick handballs are throws, alot of Dusty's don't argues have a finger tip on the throat, a lot of Graham's tackles drive a head into the ground.
If you really wanted to, you could blow your whistle during literally any contest in a game at random, and then find a legitimate free kick that's technically there.
It's a really stupid game in a lot of ways. The umpires are always gonna do it tough. But the best ones ignore the incidental, insignificant Frees they see (seeing you're going to not see 80% of them anyway). The worst ones are Razor Ray.
Dunno. Reckon as soon as the maggots put the whistle away the game degenerates into wrestle mania. Simply want the maggots to adjudicate the rules consistently n to the same standard to both teams.I’m not trying to argue with you general. My point is nothing more than imo when a game has less free kicks it’s generally a better game to watch. That’s just an opinion of course
Oooooh happy happy joy joy. The Chamber pot to remain unused n unloved on the sidelines. Might have to bring a packet of peanuts n see if I can hoop a couple in from the boundary at half time.Thank Christ he’s an emergency only. Saw the 6 named in the record and thought no please don’t let him be one of the on ground umpires. I think GWS will be just as pleased. He’d be the most hated umpire ever.
Exactly right. Umpires should not be noticed, they are not the stars of the show, they are the support staff.Agree 100%.
The best umpires impose themselves immediately on the contest and pay the first couple of frees. This sends a message to every player on the ground that they are on notice. Then they gradually ease off and only pay the obvious ones. Late in a close game, they let as much go as they can.
And nobody notices.
Razor Ray is more interested in his exaggerated, attention-seeking disco-dancing calls and, now that he is miked up, its also about spouting his nonsense on prime time.
Umpiring has been nowhere near as bad as the past two years. Our free kick differential is -4 since the bye.
It's taken them a while, but I think the umpires finally perceive us as a good side and have ceased the undue scrutiny of our players.
GWS on the other hand are the top team for frees against.
I don’t know where to start here.
I’ll give you some examples. When a player is tackled I want a fairly liberal time to get rid of it but I want that consistently. When there is a marking contest I want to see an allowance for some contact being made rather than minor incidental contact being paid a free. I want to see an understanding that ruckman will grapple.
I want those and others adjudicated consistently during a game.
As for your ridiculous comment. I’ll let it go because it’s grand final week
They never pay those. (Unless you're Richo in 1996!)
I only want to see blatant frees, no 50/50s and only frees that actually impact the play.I never think the “if the free is there pay it” argument holds up. If every free that was technically there in a game was paid we would have about 200 frees a game.
What I want is umpires to use common sense in interpreting the rules so that the game flows and generally less frees helps that as long as they are consistent in that interpretation. Consistency is the key.
It sounds like Razor has got a gig
Got my hope up there whoever posted he was going to be an emergency. Just googled it he's most likely in, but will be officially announced at a Presser tomorrow. Fox sports article says:
'Simon Meredith is expected to be named as the emergency umpire.'