Tigermad2005 said:What happen to my other two picks?
Smoking Aces said:Take that St. Kilda. Smashed from all angles by Tigs. ;D
tigs2010 said:Kelly is one I don't have in my top 10. (11th) He is a really high production junior and he will go high. Probably pick 2. But he is very much a Gaff clone who to me, is a nice player but not a guy I'd use a really high pick on.
Fair call. Those stats surprise me. Just watching them I'd have said Aish has a better contested game than Kelly. I'm going to have a bit more watching to do. Any idea what Aish was like last year as he was just coming back from the shoulder this year.bullus_hit said:He's better than Gaff, his contested possession rate is around the 35% mark, Gaff's was around the 27%, a significant difference in my opinion. Aish is actually the one who is in the Gaff territory, so it will be interesting to see how this translates to AFL. But with a DE of 87%, you'd be very tempted, it's one of those situations that could wind up being a Polec or Morton bomb, or could turn out to be a master stroke. Aish is the one player who will no doubt polarise the footballing community.
Yeah I do. Which ones don't you like? And yes I do know my rankings deviate from the norm, but there are just player types I don't rate. My rankings are based on what I think they'll become. Not what they are now. Otherwise I'd have Kelly at 2 etc. Though Bully's stats were interesting so maybe I've been harsh on him or lenient on Aish or combo of both.bengal-tiger said:Tigs 2010,some very interesting comments,and your rankings are mind blowing.
Question for you,do you actually watch any tac football,because if l was going up against you at draft time,l would be more than happy.
tigs2010 said:Yeah I do. Which ones don't you like? And yes I do know my rankings deviate from the norm, but there are just player types I don't rate. My rankings are based on what I think they'll become. Not what they are now. Otherwise I'd have Kelly at 2 etc. Though Bully's stats were interesting so maybe I've been harsh on him or lenient on Aish or combo of both.
tigs2010 said:Fair call. Those stats surprise me. Just watching them I'd have said Aish has a better contested game than Kelly. I'm going to have a bit more watching to do. Any idea what Aish was like last year as he was just coming back from the shoulder this year.
I don't know what it is about Kelly. He's a clear cut 2nd best junior. Maybe I'm just worried about his player type ending up at a *smile* club and him falling by the wayside and that's blinding me. If he was being linked to us or Collingwood, even the Dogs would be a good fit.bengal-tiger said:I don't know where to begin,josh kelly has a lot of upside,l dont think he will be an early star,but in the future he will be good.
Your comments on lewis taylor is very surprising,last year he was a deadly forward type,this year he has become a very good midfielder,he keeps on improving,he is much better than the usual small mid types.
I had to laugh about your comments about matt crouch,my guess is you haven't seen him play,except for tv,otherwise you wouldn't be making those comments.
I could go on and on ,but l would be here all day.
tigs2010 said:I don't know what it is about Kelly. He's a clear cut 2nd best junior. Maybe I'm just worried about his player type ending up at a sh!t club and him falling by the wayside and that's blinding me. If he was being linked to us or Collingwood, even the Dogs would be a good fit.
Fair enough on Taylor. I don't pay a lot of attention to the underage kids apart from the odd favourite that catches my eye which last year was Sheed and Dunstan outside the obvious Boyd. If he can play as a small forward at AFL level then he may have a chance, though I still have my doubts.
Are you trying to say I'm wrong about Crouch's kicking? It's probably a combination with his decision-making which can be ironed out.
I'm basing my rankings on what I think Richmond would do. Kicking, Competitiveness, Character and if applicable, size.
My downfall is probably I'm harsher on the guys tipped to be 1st rounders and more lenient on later guys that show something in those 4 areas albeit aren't that consistent, which skews it a little bit. For example would I take Crouch or Taylor at pick 50? Of course, but that's never going to happen.