Polygamy (Split from Christianity thread) | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Polygamy (Split from Christianity thread)

I think that everyone knows my feelings on this issue so I won't enter into the debate.

One thing I would like to ask though is the following quote an example of trying to avoid the swear filter that you just warned everyone on?


Disco08 said:
That sh!t doesn't fly on the Christianity thread.
 
jayfox said:
One thing I would like to ask though is the following quote an example of trying to avoid the swear filter that you just warned everyone on?

No it's not at all. Disco typed the proper word and the filter changed it. Good try though. ;D
 
Six Pack said:
So Foxy, you would argue that it was ok in the OT, but not ok in the NT?

I would argue, and the Bible would back me up and be my basis for this belief, that God 'allowed it for a time' in order to populate the Earth. The Bible is clear that it is not appropriate behaviour in today's world though.
 
jayfox said:
I would argue, and the Bible would back me up and be my basis for this belief, that God 'allowed it for a time' in order to populate the Earth. The Bible is clear that it is not appropriate behaviour in today's world though.

those sort of inconsistencies annoy me, Jay. but i see where yr coming from.
 
rosy23 said:
No it's not at all. Disco typed the proper word and the filter changed it. Good try though. ;D

Fair enough. This raises an interesting point though (unfortunately unrelated to this topic). Serious question, is that word considered a swear word on the forum or not? I know different people have different views of it but I believe it is a swear word ad if my kids said it or if they said it at school you could guarantee that they'd get told off for it. Just wondering what you think and if you think it is acceptable to use given the family values of this forum?
 
Six Pack said:
those sort of inconsistencies annoy me, Jay. but i see where yr coming from.

I understand what you are saying and I would certainly agree that not everything in the Bible is easy to understand. God's methods are often confusing to us but that is where we trust that He has a higher purpose that we don't understand or know about. I think, on this occasion it is not such an inconsistency too because the scriptures are very clear when that sort of behaviour was to stop once the world had been populated enough, in God's eyes, so monogamous relationships should take over.
 
jayfox said:
Fair enough. This raises an interesting point though (unfortunately unrelated to this topic). Serious question,

Seeing it's unrelated to the topic could you please re-post it on the Feedback board.  Others might want to comment and I'll add my opinion when I get a  chance too.
 
rosy23 said:
Seeing it's unrelated to the topic could you please re-post it on the Feedback board. Others might want to comment and I'll add my opinion when I get a chance too.

Done and done.
 
Six Pack said:
Would you care to outline what you mean by this and give examples, Lily?

No SuxPack...because I have argued my case about this on another thread (when the debate was about whether gay sex and gay marriage was 'natural and normal') and feel I don't need to go down the same path again.
Secondly, I feel I have politely answered questions you have asked of me yet you do not return the same courtesy by answering my question.

Six Pack said:
I'm not sure why you are linking a religious concept with a legal one in this post?

Because we are not living in a religous-controlled country.
The concept may have religious connotations or in some instances, religious traditions.....but in Australia (unlike Iran or Afghanistan when it was run by the Taliban) we have laws that override religion and religious traditions if they are deemed to be outside acceptable society.

Like I stated earlier....it is the religion of Islam that shows Mohamed had a 9 year old wife.
But adults having a 9 year old wife in our society is frowned upon...and the law is there to protect our society from such misdemeanours, no matter what the tradition or history behind the religion that says it is o.k to do such a thing.

That is why religion and the law are linked on this topic.
We are dealing with a religion that wants the law to change to allow something that is deemed illegal in our society to become acceptable.
 
I just must be a little slower than u, Lily. It takes me a while to form my views and ideas. Don't like to just fire away without thinking it through.
 
Six Pack said:
I just must be a little slower than u, Lily. It takes me a while to form my views and ideas. Don't like to just fire away without thinking it through.

SuxPack,
Well....take your time....we don't want you putting your true opinion forward if it contradicts what Disco and other anti-Liverpool forumites post now.....we can't have dissention in the ranks now, can we? :hihi