Liverpool said:That is why inferior unions are classed as illegal
Would you care to outline what you mean by this and give examples, Lily?
Liverpool said:That is why inferior unions are classed as illegal
Liverpool said:The law protects the sacredness of marriage.
Disco08 said:That sh!t doesn't fly on the Christianity thread.
jayfox said:One thing I would like to ask though is the following quote an example of trying to avoid the swear filter that you just warned everyone on?
Six Pack said:So Foxy, you would argue that it was ok in the OT, but not ok in the NT?
jayfox said:I would argue, and the Bible would back me up and be my basis for this belief, that God 'allowed it for a time' in order to populate the Earth. The Bible is clear that it is not appropriate behaviour in today's world though.
rosy23 said:No it's not at all. Disco typed the proper word and the filter changed it. Good try though. ;D
Six Pack said:those sort of inconsistencies annoy me, Jay. but i see where yr coming from.
Six Pack said:Wy would god prefer monogamy?
Six Pack said:Wy would god prefer monogamy?
jayfox said:Fair enough. This raises an interesting point though (unfortunately unrelated to this topic). Serious question,
jayfox said:Good question. When you say your prayers tonight why don't you ask Him?
rosy23 said:Seeing it's unrelated to the topic could you please re-post it on the Feedback board. Others might want to comment and I'll add my opinion when I get a chance too.
Six Pack said:Would you care to outline what you mean by this and give examples, Lily?
Six Pack said:I'm not sure why you are linking a religious concept with a legal one in this post?
Six Pack said:I just must be a little slower than u, Lily. It takes me a while to form my views and ideas. Don't like to just fire away without thinking it through.
Six Pack said:Nah i can think for myself, Lily.