If they’d won, the narrative would be how ‘brave’ Paddy played on through injury. No mention is made of how Houli played most of the game carrying an injury.
Yes. Commentators were creaming themselves after his amazing game up forward against the swans.Funny how the narrative has changed, last yr he was playing fwd to "bamboozle the Tiges" (despite having tried that in the H&A game last yr) now he was playing there because he was injured...
Yes. Commentators were creaming themselves after his amazing game up forward against the swans.
Guaranteed to give the Tigers a headache.
plays forward against us and fails. Commentators complain saying he should have been playing midfield
Yes. Commentators were creaming themselves after his amazing game up forward against the swans.
Guaranteed to give the Tigers a headache.
plays forward against us and fails. Commentators complain saying he should have been playing midfield
Especially one the Clubs seems to view as the saviour, especially thier fansJust putting the obvious media bias aside for a moment, it's pretty big news that the best player in one of our key rivals is on an individual program at this stage of preparation.
Tough ask to produce in season off the back of that sort of training load.
For a player of his standing/reputation in the game his performance was embarrassing.Even when he went into the midfield he was useless.
The only times i noticed him was the miskick that lead to baker kicking it to Riewodlt and the mistackle on dusty.
Besides that all i saw from him was diving forward at every opportunity to get a free kick.
He isnt as good as the media make him out to be.
Im pretty sure even Geelong supporters realise that now.
It's beyond that now.For a player of his standing/reputation in the game his performance was embarrassing.
Poor Danger, went the full clench shuffling off the ground after the game n strained something important.View attachment 11478hearld sun
Another Dangerfield story
Did he get the injury after sniffing Dusty's jocks?
Most of them don’t analyse. They just change with the wind, depending on what happened most recently.Pretty much sums up the journos/commentators who write about footy. To say their analysis is shallow would be to pay them a huge compliment.
DS
There’s a few writers for it. I thought one of them was a Geelong supporter. They’re able to for the most put aside their bias’ and write about the actual game, which is something no football journalist does now.The Mongrel Punt writer never misses a chance to slap him right up the face either. Does not rate him at all. Would have thought he was a tiger fan but keeps explaining he is a hawk fan.
There is very little analysis, they all wait for someone on breakfast radio to come up with a rule change idea then jump on the bandwagon via an opinion piece. For such a wide ranging industry there is very little varietyPretty much sums up the journos/commentators who write about footy. To say their analysis is shallow would be to pay them a huge compliment.
DS
Always enjoy his work.The Mongrel Punt writer never misses a chance to slap him right up the face either. Does not rate him at all. Would have thought he was a tiger fan but keeps explaining he is a hawk fan.
Hope it's telling that this is in the Clangerfield thread and not the general Cats thread.....Bit of a whisper that things aren’t all that great amongst sections of the Cats playing group.
Fair bit of friction between some senior players after a review of the grand final loss.
Story is that one senior player voiced a strong opinion about the selection of Gary Ablett in the team, and got taken to task by a couple of others.
Bit of a whisper that things aren’t all that great amongst sections of the Cats playing group.
Fair bit of friction between some senior players after a review of the grand final loss.
Story is that one senior player voiced a strong opinion about the selection of Gary Ablett in the team, and got taken to task by a couple of others.
Bit of a whisper that things aren’t all that great amongst sections of the Cats playing group.
Fair bit of friction between some senior players after a review of the grand final loss.
Story is that one senior player voiced a strong opinion about the selection of Gary Ablett in the team, and got taken to task by a couple of others.