Media still failing all over themselves over how great footy is. It's like they haven't been watching the last two weeks! Defensive flooding slowly but sury creeping back in. By next week there won't be 100p scored.
Crowds are well down. They can claim reduced capacity but many seats are going begging. I think people have woken up that the ticket outlets are combining with ground managers to gouge punters.
Yep the free flowing bruise free ping pong football is slowing down as teams adjust to the new rule. Don't worry SHocking and the AFL are working on the new density rule next year to rectify this.Media still failing all over themselves over how great footy is. It's like they haven't been watching the last two weeks! Defensive flooding slowly but sury creeping back in. By next week there won't be 100p scored.
Nah, ToO, it's slowly coming back to a normal contested grind. There wasn't as much bruise free football this week. Our game, the sydney/ess and melb/geel were hard tough games. Even the saints come back was on the back of contested rather than uncontested free flowing football.Results highlighting that the game has turned on its head from last year due to the SHocking rule changes.
Do we have the list to evolve with it? I’m not sure tbh as we have a lot of players who thrive on contested ball.
Going to find if we do out soon enough.
He wouldn't be so bold as to say it outright. It was paraphrased by Scott Gullan who obviously had a souce on the Competition Committee.Can anyone show me where the article about SHocking saying that the new rules were designed to counteract Richmonds stretching the man on the mark rules.
I was talking to some mates about it & they said they hadn't seen anything like that in the media. I would like to show them that article.
cheers TT33
He wouldn't be so bold as to say it outright. It was paraphrased by Scott Gullan who obviously had a souce on the Competition Committee.
https://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/...e/news-story/5bfd3cb5621aceb115cb44207d08afcb (paywalled)
Last few para.
It may have been, but I didn't see it.Cheers Lee, I thought it was in another article somewhere else too.
I thought he already was.Apparently SHocking is in line to be next Geelong CEO, got all my fingers and toes crossed that this happens.
I will be astonished if any reply I may receive resembles transparency, accountability or adequacy in any way. I'll keep you posted
Dear AFL,
I have been an AFL participant and viewer for nearly 50 years.
It came to my attention on the weekend, watching the coverage of Sydney V Richmond,
That a camera crew (Fox?) apparently entered the Playing Surface after a Sydney goal,
And broadcast a close up of a Sydney goal celebration.
Over all the years in my participation in the game as a player, coach and viewer, I always understood that anyone other than Players, Umpires and the participating teams runners
Entering the Playing Surface, was a serious offence, for good reason ( to both protect and not obstruct players and umpires)
The Laws of Australian Football state,
6. TEAM OFFICIALS AND TEAM RUNNER
- 6.1 CONTROLLING BODY TO REGULATE
A Controlling Body shall adopt rules which:
- (a) specify the times and occasions when an Official and Team Runner may enter the Playing Surface; and
- (b) identify the tasks or duties which such persons may perform when on the Playing Surface.
Under those same rules, does a camera crew constitute an Official or a Team Runner?
Official: includes but is not limited to an officer, coach, assistant coach, trainer, runner, employee or any person performing any duties (paid or unpaid) for or on behalf of a Club or Team.
Playing Surface: the field of play inside the Boundary Line, Goal Line and Behind Line, excluding the area between such lines and the perimeter fence
Can you please confirm
1. If this occurred?,
2. If it breached The AFL Laws of Australian Football?
Your sincerely,
EZY
I think you're onto somethingWhining about the length of the game is contagious.
Dimma did it at the end of his presser.
If the AFL change the length of quarters to less than 20 minutes it will be another fix to a problem caused by other rule changes they have introduced.
Rule change 1: Need more open play... Introduce a cap to the number of interchanges. Leads to less scoring.
Rule change 2: Need more open play to increase scoring... Reduce the interchange cap. Leads to less scoring.
Rule change 3: Need more open play and more scoring because there aren't enough advertising slots for the broadcasters to use... Reduce the interchange cap and increase the time between a goal and the bounce. Leads to less scoring and more injuries, which leads to longer games as a result of the injuries and the advertising gap.
Rule change 4: Need to cater for the increase in injuries. Reintroduce the sub!!! Does nothing to reduce injuries and game length and nothing to increase scoring.
Proposed rule change 5: Reduce injuries. Shorten the game. GOTO Rule change 1.