And the twitter conspiracy theorists in the US have now kicked off with "the Navy knew they were dead all the time but Biden didn't let them announce it as a psy-ops distraction!!!"
I'm not even kidding.
On the news coverage there was a discussion hypothesising a recovery mission to retrieve the bodies. The rescue team coordinators dismissed it as something they won’t do, hinting that the difficulty vs benefits make it not worth contemplating. For sure, agree wholeheartedly with that.
But the nature of the discussion suggested that there actually would be tangible bodies in existence to recover. I was under the impression from our earlier discussion that the bodies would have been obliterated by the pressure.
Really sad. I'm hearing that did the dive to confirm that the Titanic swim pool was still holding water even after all those yearsUnfortunately there wouldn't be too much to recover.
Reckon I must be one of them totally callous old bastards. Got bugger all sympathy for the people who go out n do the mountain climbing, mini sub diving, race driving, base jumping type of extreme adventure stuff, just coz they love the thrill and excitement. Good luck to them pushing the boundaries and having their fun, but don't come pissin and moanin to me when it all goes pear shaped n *smile* you over. It's your choice, enjoy if you can. Only ones I ever feel any sympathy for, are the poor bastards gotta go out n risk their own arses trying to rescue them when it's all gone pear shaped.Isn't part of human existence curiosity about all manner of things?
Would these same posters have said sucked in to Hillary if he had persished on Everest or said the same about Shackleton if he had frozen in the Antarctic? Were those expedition attempts necessary?
Now obviously this submarine and its crew are not adventurers in the vein of Hillary/Shackleton but hasn't a by-product of attempting daring and dangerous deeds (like the search for Titanic?) been the discovery of all sorts of technology that has resulted in improvements to life and living standards?
Was there such little sympathy for Christa McAuliffe when she perished on the space shuttle challanger?
Is plunging the depths to look at the Titanic an indulgence only a few could afford/experience? Perhaps but should that mean no rescue be attempted? And should concern for their welfare be deemed unworthy?
Wouldn't have drowned them, they'd have been crushed pretty near instantaneous. At the depth and pressure they were trying for, due to the strength of the hull of the sub it would hold solid until such time as it failed n it would be an instant pressure smash of thousands of PSI.I know it sounds morbid and perhaps a bit disrespectful. But I'm genuinely curious, what materially happens to the bodies in that scenario? Obviously the people are both crushed to death and drowned. I wouldn't have thought an implosion is the same situation as someone standing right next to an explosion, that they are blown apart and their body becomes many little pieces, but of course I could be entirely wrong on that. Hence the question.
For whatever sort of fishies n critters that happen to live down that deep. Might make a nice sort of bouillabaisse.Like really rich stockcubes?
Then there's the previous customer who was so impressed by the whole fancy adventure he invested into the company. Happily still got his arse intact but his wallet mighta copped a fair beating.plus the CEO is imploded micro algae in a deckchair, 4000m below sea-level
There's a pretty good chance that it won't explode and as long as the pilot doesn't get lost on the way, we shouldn't have to search to far to find you.Some of the responses made me think.
Soon I'll be going in a pressure can vessel, mostly carbon fibre and aluminium. Most of the passengers are exceedingly well off.
Its high tech and a playground for the wealthy of the world.
I'm only flying to Sydney but I hope the tincan doesnt explode.
And if it does I hope people search fir the wreckage.
The Titan had 6 inch carbon fibre hull, hermetically sealed.
Isn't part of human existence curiosity about all manner of things?
Would these same posters have said sucked in to Hillary if he had persished on Everest or said the same about Shackleton if he had frozen in the Antarctic? Were those expedition attempts necessary?
Now obviously this submarine and its crew are not adventurers in the vein of Hillary/Shackleton but hasn't a by-product of attempting daring and dangerous deeds (like the search for Titanic?) been the discovery of all sorts of technology that has resulted in improvements to life and living standards?
Was there such little sympathy for Christa McAuliffe when she perished on the space shuttle challanger?
Is plunging the depths to look at the Titanic an indulgence only a few could afford/experience? Perhaps but should that mean no rescue be attempted? And should concern for their welfare be deemed unworthy?
all human lives are equal for better or worse. At least they should be, regardless of skin colour, wealth or sex.
No because as I said in the rest of my post I have a personal connection with Trent. I’ve met him a few times, spent time with him & cheered for him for over a decade. I’m not sure what your point is.Youde grieve for steve hocking as youde grieve for trent cotchin?
No because as I said in the rest of my post I have a personal connection with Trent. I’ve met him a few times, spent time with him & cheered for him for over a decade. I’m not sure what your point is.