I reckon he is at his peak as as they say you can't teach an old dog new tricks so I reckon Parker is not our futurePick him up as a rookie .
He is lively and will be improved with a full pre season.
I reckon he is at his peak as as they say you can't teach an old dog new tricks so I reckon Parker is not our futurePick him up as a rookie .
He is lively and will be improved with a full pre season.
If Pickett goes then it makes sense to keep a hard nut inside mid on the listReports saying he will get another year
You’re relying on Mitch Unclearly ?Reports saying he will get another year
Agreed I reckon hit site in the 18-26 range of players. We will be picking up another 5-6 youngsters who may not be physically capable of playing next year. Again 1 year at minimum. He might surprisePeople bemoan that we don’t have depth, and want to delist him. He is our depth plug and play from the wing to a forward option. I’m happy to give him another year based on what I have seen on his limited preparation and time learning the game plan.
Not sure who said it , I thought you’d be thrilledYou’re relying on Mitch Unclearly ?
played every game like it was his last , I’d like to think with a contract he may relax a little and play with a bit more composure, meaning a better all round playerGeez, the guy came into the club half way through the year, he did good to even play a game learning our system.
That alone would be worth a contract and also would be on min chips, we need players like him on the list to allow us to keep players like dusty and shai.
If he is our depth we are in a good position.
Sure we need a hard nut in the guts of our team but not sure that Parker is a suitable hard nut with much else to offerIf Pickett goes then it makes sense to keep a hard nut inside mid on the list
Good.Reports saying he will get another year