He wanted to play for Richmond and even offered to play for less than what he was offered at the Lions but wanted the 2 year deal that Brisbane had and we only gave him a 1 year deal.Yes. Turned us down and picked Brisbane.
Wise move
#24Welcome to the lad.
Good Luck.
Any news on a number?
I think he was in 34 at both Aints and Sth Freo.
Given that number is Fridge Graham, I wonder what his second choice is.
That's what I'm really curious about too but expect we'll never find out now. Someone in the meeja dubbed the Bummers 'Richmond Lite' - might have been Healy. They are seeking to duplicate us even more than the failed Colonwood and Aints models.Any goss on whether Parker was our primary target or we intended to take Sam Durham?
Here's his interview:Parker was just interviewed on Dwaynes' World, will post when podcast is up.
Spoke a lot about doing the hard yards away from club after being delisted from St Kilda, letting his footy doing the talking and looking forward to working hard at the Tige's.
I reckon we might be on a winner.
Agreed there's that but the interesting part is how he's blossomed in the midfield and on the wing. Would be a great inclusion to the midfield/fwd rotation with Dusty, Shai et al. Hardwick's magnets will surely get a workout with another utility.Think he can play half forward. George and Dan are struggling.
We have no one else in their places and he is better overhead and a tough nut.
Ideal player to keep Lever or Salem busy, or Rich or Stewart. Could be quite a win if that frees up one of our talls
and means we don't have to play 3 talls all the time at the expense of run and pressure.
I agree he is a Townsend choice and just what we are missing.
If you look at the losses to the top 3 sides you can see that what he brings up forward would make us goals better and opposition goals weaker.
Inspired choice.
It was another Stocker maneuver!I'd imagine given there was noise about Durham and Freeman, but nothing about Parker, we had some very good manipulation of leaks in our favour.
What Would Richmond Do? is paying off for Melbourne.Yep.
Essendon so want to be us that they have taken our coaches, replicating our game plan and are targeting similar player types. No doubt they would have taken Parker if our interest was made public.
Only if he wears a flat cap.No, very Tommy Shelby.
Here for it.
I'm listening but I need someone to tell me.Can play
But
Someone would want to listen to why the reason the Saints got rid of him
Interesting selection
I think there missing a bit more then thatMy Saints mates liked him when he played for them. They think he's exactly what they're missing now & are not really sure why he fell out of favour.
I agree the guy plays with some real exuberance, playing on etc we re lacking that from our robotic HF . There’s a role for this guy, the rest is up to himIf his celebrations are natural and not put on just annoy his opponents, why would you try to curb that? I dare say his exuberant celebrations flows through to his tackling and crashing bodies.
I’ll balance that with why they got rid of nick hind , if he couldn’t slot into their side I’ll be ,,,,Can play
But
Someone would want to listen to why the reason the Saints got rid of him
Interesting selection
And what was the reason for the Saints getting rid of him???
It’s already started.a good mate of mine is a 3rd gen mad saint.
he reckons Parker didnt cope with Covid; lockdown and hubs.
reckons he has some real tricks and is a good pick up.
I expect those that published The Defects of Sydney Stack,
will sink the boots into Our M.P with a heap of *smile*, first chance they get too?
they'll be 'hearing' all sorts of things on the withered Grapevine of The Irrelevant.