Majac Daw

[Tiger Pops]

has the trial finished. by all accounts it looks fairly bad for him. If convicted surely this is jail time (and rightful so if has been proven guilty!)

 

[pumped]

Mabior Chol.

much better.

 

[Bunnerz]

North will rookie him for the 2016 season.

 

[Tony Braxton-Hicks]

They did.

 

[seven]

They did.

fools.

 

[Rosy]

Based on the initial evidence I have read in the paper, it is looking that way to me. Some talk that he has a second one on the cards too isn't there?

Something the supposed second victim has denied.

 

[69 vintage]

Found Not Guilty today .

 

[The_General]

Found Not Guilty today .

Was always gonna happen. AFL players always get off for serious crimes.
The girl should have waited until he's retired, then she'd have gotten an allegedly better result.

 

[Rosy]

Was always gonna happen. AFL players always get off for serious crimes.
The girl should have waited until he's retired, then she'd have gotten an allegedly better result.

Pretty ordinary General. That seems to be an assumption of guilt. It may well have never happened. It's not for us to judge or speculate about.

 

[blx]

Whether he is guilty or not doesn't matter, he will suffer for the rest of his life as General has proven with his post.

 

[Panthera Tigris]

I'd take a different tact and say that in hind site this was probably the most likely outcome. Not because of some sort of conspiracy theory that it's because he's an AFL footballer. More because, as the case went on it appeared to be more or less a he said/she said scenario. And happened years ago when they were both minors. Pretty hard to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the offense occurred. Unless it can be proven beyond reasonable doubt, a guilty verdict will never happen.

Was it a fair & just result? Who knows. I suppose it is one of those situations where only Majak and the compainant will ever know for sure.

 

[WesternTiger]

Pretty ordinary General. That seems to be an assumption of guilt. It may well have never happened. It's not for us to judge or speculate about.

Agree pretty poor post.

 

[CarnTheTiges]

I'd take a different tact and say that in hind site this was probably the most likely outcome. Not because of some sort of conspiracy theory that it's because he's an AFL footballer. More because, as the case went on it appeared to be more or less a he said/she said scenario. And happened years ago when they were both minors. Pretty hard to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the offense occurred. Unless it can be proven beyond reasonable doubt, a guilty verdict will never happen.

Was it a fair & just result? Who knows. I suppose it is one of those situations where only Majak and the compainant will ever know for sure.

I agree, PT. Once it turned into a he said/she said scenario, this was always going to be the likely outcome of the case.