North assistance package 1x end first round 23, 2x end first round 24 right? And now pick 3 compo, superstar compo for just a good player. In effect, assistance now a top 4 pick and 3 end first round picks.
Its terrible, the basis for both assistance and compo is terrible, the execution is terrible, the explanation is terrible. Ans the fact the 2 weren't connected is terrible, ie you already have 3 assistance picks so you can't expect too much for HM.
I really hated Rawlings playing rhetorical hardball with the AFL after being doled out 3 freebies already for being crap..no shame, more front than myers.
I really hate this compo decision in isolation too. Pick 4? Its objectively indefensible. Where do you go from there? Its the same compo as a side would get for Petracca, DeGoey, Butters, Curnow. If McKay is worth pick 4, that makes Shai worth 2 pick 4s etc etc. What is wrong with these clowns?
Its terrible, the basis for both assistance and compo is terrible, the execution is terrible, the explanation is terrible. Ans the fact the 2 weren't connected is terrible, ie you already have 3 assistance picks so you can't expect too much for HM.
I really hated Rawlings playing rhetorical hardball with the AFL after being doled out 3 freebies already for being crap..no shame, more front than myers.
I really hate this compo decision in isolation too. Pick 4? Its objectively indefensible. Where do you go from there? Its the same compo as a side would get for Petracca, DeGoey, Butters, Curnow. If McKay is worth pick 4, that makes Shai worth 2 pick 4s etc etc. What is wrong with these clowns?