I’ve liked his season but I would replace him with a marking option - probably Caddy.
Aarts has done his job throughout the year. By Bringing Caddy, its a better option for us now. Caddy is a big body player, can mark and break tackles. Aarts was out muscled by a bigger opposition.I’ve liked his season but I would replace him with a marking option - probably Caddy.
Aarts main role is to be at the feet of Lynch and he's done a great job all year. Chol made it impossible for him
I hope you are right
Hardly Chol's fault that Aarts couldn't be at the feet of LynchAarts main role is to be at the feet of Lynch and he's done a great job all year. Chol made it impossible for him
But Chol in the past 2 games has shown to be lazy, running late to ruck contests, unable to win the ball, jumping to soon, not willing to do the team thing.Hardly Chol's fault that Aarts couldn't be at the feet of Lynch
Aarts has done his job throughout the year. By Bringing Caddy, its a better option for us now. Caddy is a big body player, can mark and break tackles. Aarts was out muscled by a bigger opposition.
He gives 100% and does his bit defensively, but 2 effective kicks and 2 effective handballs, no scores, no assists can't be considered a pass for a small forward except on the most lenient of Steve Morris scorecards.
His out was that it wasn't a night for forwards, the chains of play weren't there for him to get involved in.
Butler better than Aarts
List manager error
Agree Caddy is big in finals. Another strong marking optionCaddy’s omission was the worst selection committee mistake this year.
A hardened, smart and tough proven finals performer.
Injury their only excuse. Otherwise woeful decision.
Would have kicked at least 2 with the opportunities that Chol was given. Probably 3.
Scoreboard?Aarts is a pressure forward.
In the 90s it was simple - small forwards affect results with pressure. And margins with score.That just keeps getting more obvious.
Small forwards? Presssure. To win.
How do we measure that?