Yep let's go with that.Was Dimma's tour of the fARC and it's system a catalyst for this to be fast tracked. I bet Scotty had to fess upto the fact they *smile* us and asked "what can we do to smooth this over". Dimma said "Get us Taranto and Hopper for nix and we're sweet, if not, we'll out your fARCing sham".
Taranto 6 and Hopper no Brownlow votes - fantastic bargaining tool for the club. Second rounder at most for both!
Pretty sure Hopper wanted to leave. B Hill, Taranto and Bruhn would free up at least $1.2mill you would think. If they're replaced with drafts, which seems likely, I don't think it's urgent to also offload Hopper. I don't think 19 will do the job.Hopper only playes 7 games this year and has had 2 bouts of knee surgery, plus he is a salary dump - not worth more than pick 19.
The knee injury would be of some concern. Hope he's on to op of it now.Hopper only playes 7 games this year and has had 2 bouts of knee surgery, plus he is a salary dump - not worth more than pick 19.
Taranto was talking about how he loved Sydney more than Melbourne and wanted to stay but then they low-balled him and we sure didn't.Pretty sure Hopper wanted to leave. B Hill, Taranto and Bruhn would free up at least $1.2mill you would think. If they're replaced with drafts, which seems likely, I don't think it's urgent to also offload Hopper. I don't think 19 will do the job.
I guess the question is how much salary cap do they need to offload, $1mill is what I heard. Bedford would likely be a Bruhn salary replacement. New draftees earn appox $100k from memory. 3 delistings and *smile* retired. They have 3 other 21yo's not yet recontracted. At $1.5mill over it would still be an issue but media tend to over-sensationalise and overstate. I just don't think 11 and 19 alone will snag Hopper and Taranto and if we low ball the offer they may just choose to keep him and find another way.Taranto was talking about how he loved Sydney more than Melbourne and wanted to stay but then they low-balled him and we sure didn't.
They are bringing in Bedford, which will cancel out one of Hill or Bruhn's savings. Add in three or four draftees and remember they're $1.5m over the cap and it's pretty obvious they need Hopper gone too.
Yeah, it'll involve another pick and/or a player you'd think.I just don't think 11 and 19 alone will snag Hopper and Taranto
Balmey will offer up a few of his iced vovos when he lets them know what the deal is.I still can't fathom how we will get this done. I guess we'll soon find out.
We will get this done easily. Media will make out the deal is on the verge of collapse every hour until magically both deals get done. Think of it this way, there is no way the club would go to the trouble of offering both T&H 7 yr deals and not be prepared to trade what is necessary to get them in.I still can't fathom how we will get this done. I guess we'll soon find out.
I'm not questioning the Tigers desire to get it done but to get it done I think it will require more than 11 and 19 which means some creative trading which may rely on other trades getting done. Seems many here think 11 and 19 will do it. Personally I'd be ecstatic if it does but regardless I am very apprehensive about the long-term deal being offered for 2 players of the same and position.We will get this done easily. Media will make out the deal is on the verge of collapse every hour until magically both deals get done. Think of it this way, there is no way the club would go to the trouble of offering both T&H 7 yr deals and not be prepared to trade what is necessary to get them in.
I think you’re right. Even if he stayed they are in trouble this time next year as he will be a free agent, clubs will coming knocking and they’ll have to give him a nice contract to keep him (which would put more pressure on their salary cap).Taranto was talking about how he loved Sydney more than Melbourne and wanted to stay but then they low-balled him and we sure didn't.
They are bringing in Bedford, which will cancel out one of Hill or Bruhn's savings. Add in three or four draftees and remember they're $1.5m over the cap and it's pretty obvious they need Hopper gone too.
Pick 12, Future 1st & Future 3rd.Yeah, it'll involve another pick and/or a player you'd think.
I like this, but unfortunately I don’t think you’re allowed to trade out more than one future pick (unless you get one back from somewhere). I think we’ll have to give up one of 19 or 30 (probably 19).Pick 12, Future 1st & Future 3rd.
GWS will be flush with picks this year.
We get Tarranto, Hopper & 39.
Got to draft with 19, 30 & 39.
Still a very good hand.
Wasnt aware of that. Well that goes that idea!I like this, but unfortunately I don’t think you’re allowed to trade out more than one future pick (unless you get one back from somewhere). I think we’ll have to give up one of 19 or 30 (probably 19).
If Keeler gets to 19 (and we draft him), that's gold Jerry.Pick 12, Future 1st & Future 3rd.
GWS will be flush with picks this year.
We get Tarranto, Hopper & 39.
Got to draft with 19, 30 & 39.
Still a very good hand.
You can do it, as long as you have the chance to get one back you don't actually have to get it before you do the trade. Geelong did it a few years ago.I like this, but unfortunately I don’t think you’re allowed to trade out more than one future pick (unless you get one back from somewhere). I think we’ll have to give up one of 19 or 30 (probably 19).