Sintiger said:
In economic terms it was most probably a very poor Government , in social terms the Whitlam years are arguably the most important in Australia's history.
Disagree profusely.
Gough was more likely an economic genius but the benefits of wealth and opportunity were for PEOPLE long term and not governments short term.
Some mistakes were made but certain remedies could not pass because he lacked numbers and of course the oil crisis and the plateauing of post war growth hit pretty much every advanced economy from about 1974 onwards.. BUT..
All those who benefited from his free unis might want to consider how much wealthier that policy made them.
Or how much a a medicare saves a family budget and the financial existence of the family itself when catastrophe hits.
How much tribunals and fault free divorce save people money in legal disputes.
Or how much our trade with China means to us considering Gough established that relationship.
Also Gough's government was the high watermark in wage and salary earners proportion of Australia's income.
Under Gough they constituted 64.7% of Gross Domestic product (roughly what Australia makes each year calculated in the value of goods and services)
Under Howard it got down to 52% after Workchoices was introduced.
And as I alluded to in a previous post... How rich would we have collectively been if our government owned our energy resources pretty much like Norway does?
It was a life well lived and many of us probably need to consider how Gough gave so many the opportunity to advance their economic status as well as respecting the dignity of all australians regrdless of sex, orientation, ethnicity or religion.
And just as a postscript he forced the Country party to change its name if I remember well? ;D