It has to be a lot, obviously for that deal to be on the table, but that is insanity.BTW, I have heard that Bowes is owed $1.6 million for the next two years. That is why pick 7 is included.
It has to be a lot, obviously for that deal to be on the table, but that is insanity.BTW, I have heard that Bowes is owed $1.6 million for the next two years. That is why pick 7 is included.
Wages for a pick 7 or pretty much any pick in the first two years is roughly $100 k plus senior match payments, so that's not really relevant. How much a player earns after the first two years is purely subject to performance n contract negotiations.What's minimum wage for a pick 7? Hopefully you get a good player and Bowe improves. The average salary across the two from that perspective does become more palatable. He was highly praised as a junior. Bloody interesting to see how this turns out.
The speculated $ 600 k a year is a fairly fat call, $ 800 k a year coz he's been back loaded to buggery is hovering somewhere between incompetent n insane.If we did the Pick 7 + Bowes trade I think it would be only for one reason.
Because we need the pick for the Taranto + Hopper deal.
BTW, I have heard that Bowes is owed $1.6 million for the next two years. That is why pick 7 is included.
Media are now running with the story. Bowes + pick 7.If we did the Pick 7 + Bowes trade I think it would be only for one reason.
Because we need the pick for the Taranto + Hopper deal.
BTW, I have heard that Bowes is owed $1.6 million for the next two years. That is why pick 7 is included.
Could also blow up your salary cap and in 2 years time you lose players like Bolton , Baker , Sonsie etcPick 7 is a decent carrot to dangle.
Bold move to take on Bowes contract but could very well pay off.
GC would still want a late 1st rounder back I would have thought.
Could also blow up your salary cap and in 2 years time you lose players like Bolton , Baker , Sonsie etc
This deal is only good for us if we get rid of 2-3 players that cover this salary that we no longer have a need for
and even tat is questionable
Broken. I think the only players in a similar position was Kennedy for Judd and the Steak knives in the Beams trade Crisp.Media are now running with the story. Bowes + pick 7.
How would Bowes be feeling now?
Ouch!
We could ask taranto & hopper to take a cut.W
We haven't got 600k to waste.
Easily, and they've got plenty of room in their magic cap to bring in another million$ worth of trade ins as well.So Collingwood would be paying in excess of $500,000 for 2 players to be playing at other clubs next year.
Did they get it from PRE or Big Footy??Media are now running with the story. Bowes + pick 7.
How would Bowes be feeling now?
Ouch!
PRE. But then went to big footy for confirmation.Did they get it from PRE or Big Footy??
Collingwood forum I read warns supporters to expect a 3rd rounder for Grundy as long as the other team takes on his whole contract.So Collingwood would be paying in excess of $500,000 for 2 players to be playing at other clubs next year.
Last season Freo got Brodie AND pick 19 for pick 24 (with a bit of pick shuffling on later picks)Does that make Bowes like a sort of Veale Deal.
Kids been on good coin for not much stress for a few years now so its no wonder he hasnt stepped it right up, hasnt really had to.
Now the crunch has hit.
Picks 61 , 69 and future 4ths are nothing picks and simply an attempt last year designed to coverup the dumpLast season Freo got Brodie AND pick 19 for pick 24 (with a bit of pick shuffling on later picks)
Edit: Brodie, 19, 61 and 69 for a future 2nd and future 4th.
If we are paying 100% of Hoppers $ next yr GWS surely can't be overly demanding at the trade table. After all they have to trade or be over the cap. this is a good bargaining chip for us in that deal.Collingwood forum I read warns supporters to expect a 3rd rounder for Grundy as long as the other team takes on his whole contract.