LeeToRainesToRoach said:We won the clangers 45-36.
Thought so.
At least we won something
LeeToRainesToRoach said:We won the clangers 45-36.
Ridley said:Hopefully this is lie the Saints game in 2017. Too bad to be true. Just move on to next week.
se7en said:Can just imagine the doggies pregame assessment of us;
Beveridge: don’t worry guys, we’ve got the Tigers game plan worked out.
A1: what if the convert to plan B?
Silence...
Everyone bursts into laughter.
easy said:Yes.
I think the MC will agree Menadue for Garthwaite was a selection error. I was all for it, but it seems a mistake.
we will never know.
was strange how slow we looked, with a very fast side on paper.
dirty night. bin tape.
tigersnake said:don't give up your day job.
23.21.159 said:Reckon our result against Port was an upset.
Doesn't look all that great now but at the time we had lost the last two and it was the only game this year we had all of the big four out.
Nobody expected us to win that one.
tigersnake said:Suddenly it "trudge" ? funny. when we're winning its force, storm, stream etc. Sums up the whole rooster to feather duster, penthouse to the sh!thouse nature of footy right there.
On the fringe players, if we'd fallen off the cliff and were 2-5, or even 3-4, you might have a point. This is just reality, it nothing unique to us or something we have to go into crisis talks over. We have 3 of our 4 best players out. Full stop. Every flag side has some stars and then a bunch of average to good players who buy in and hit form. Thats footy, thats flags, not unique to us. Take 3 of the 4 best players out of any side in history and they go from great to good or OK. I actually think on balance we've done pretty well. Last night was dirty, but not sure what people expect. 3 of our best 4 out, heap of young players and fringe players in.
Tend to agree. Had a feeling we were never going to win that one. Dogs pulled the game of their season out of their asses which didn't help.Harry said:Not too concerned with the loss. We were without our fab 4, our full back (naughton doesn't dominate if dave plays), grigg, and an injured rioli and vloss. Positives are we are getting games into stack ross baker bolton higgins balta who will improve our side overall going forward
frawleyudud said:Tend to agree. Had a feeling we were never going to win that one. Dogs pulled the game of their season out of their asses which didn't help.
Although we need to get smarter with our team selections. Garthwaite on Naughton could have been the perfect match up. This needs to be addressed. Been a few games this year where selections or non selections have hurt us.
Harry said:People don't rate dave but he's crucial to our structure.
Pretty spot on. Worrying sign is that it has happened a few times this year.TOT70 said:We lost this one at selection. We had three players missing from the goal-to-goal line and replaced them with three flankers. We have responded to the loss of Rance by moving Edwards to centre-half back and will probably get away with this move as long as there is plenty of height elsewhere in the back line. Then we replaced Astbury with Menadue. This is not a pot on Menadue but it sent a really clear message to the Bulldogs, that we didn't rate their talls and we gambled that our speed down back would trump any height advantage that they had.
Bad move. In this competition, you can't afford to show no respect to an opponent. They have a tendency to show you up when you do.
Poor selection, in my opinion.
It has also highlighted a really serious problem that we need to try to address at the Mid-season draft. We really need to find another tall defender who can play on the marking talls like Naughton. Without one, we are going to lose games regularly. Speed is great but it is useless when they bomb it in to an imposing forward and he outmarks the defenders. This strategy only needs to work a few times a game and the result will go south very quickly. Astbury coming back will help but, seriously, what did we expect was going to happen when Grimes and Broad were the only two tall defenders? It was just an invitation to load up and bomb it long.
Naughton, Bontempelli and Gowers were more than enough to get the job done.
TOT70 said:We lost this one at selection. We had three players missing from the goal-to-goal line and replaced them with three flankers. We have responded to the loss of Rance by moving Edwards to centre-half back and will probably get away with this move as long as there is plenty of height elsewhere in the back line. Then we replaced Astbury with Menadue. This is not a pot on Menadue but it sent a really clear message to the Bulldogs, that we didn't rate their talls and we gambled that our speed down back would trump any height advantage that they had.
Bad move. In this competition, you can't afford to show no respect to an opponent. They have a tendency to show you up when you do.
Poor selection, in my opinion.
It has also highlighted a really serious problem that we need to try to address at the Mid-season draft. We really need to find another tall defender who can play on the marking talls like Naughton. Without one, we are going to lose games regularly. Speed is great but it is useless when they bomb it in to an imposing forward and he outmarks the defenders. This strategy only needs to work a few times a game and the result will go south very quickly. Astbury coming back will help but, seriously, what did we expect was going to happen when Grimes and Broad were the only two tall defenders? It was just an invitation to load up and bomb it long.
Naughton, Bontempelli and Gowers were more than enough to get the job done.
Tigers of Old said:Jon Marsh was the guy. We listed Weller instead..
Tigers of Old said:Jon Marsh was the guy. We listed Weller instead..
zippadeee said:There’s one player would be perfect if they introduced Mid Season Trading.
Ben Reid