Game day Tigers v Hawks | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Game day Tigers v Hawks

AFL Rule 1.1.1 If Nick Vlastuin intercept marks in front of you, you can punch him in the back of the head.
 
  • Angry
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
Most amazing score review I have ever seen.

Ball went through for a behind, only doubt was whether it touched the behind post.

Insufficient evidence to suggest it touched the post. So umpires call, which the goal umpire called as out of bounds initially.

Throw in results in a goal to Hawthorn.

Seriously, so dumb.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Streak said:
Most amazing score review I have ever seen.

Ball went through for a behind, only doubt was whether it touched the behind post.

Insufficient evidence to suggest it touched the post. So umpires call, which the goal umpire called as out of bounds initially.

Throw in results in a goal to Hawthorn.

Seriously, so dumb.
Click to expand...
*smile*'ing incompetent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Umpires call is no score, just want to see what side of the post the ball went...

ARC - Insufficient evidence to see whether the ball hit the post?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
< I reckon other 'top' teams will be trembling in their boots to have to play us in a final. | Round 22 - the dead goldfish games. >
Official PRE merch now on Redbubble!
Top Bottom