I think that just shows how poisoned the water is around Hird. He doesn't try and bypass Reid, he asks a colleague to talk to him and use his 'United Nations' skills, ie negotiate an outcome.
He also says they don't want to push the boundaries and they need to stay inside the rules, but people don't take that at face value.
The reason he was wanting the program to run is pretty clear I think. He has these two bozos telling him this is cutting edge stuff and the other clubs are ahead of them and getting an advantage. They are also telling him Dr Reid isn't up to speed with this modern stuff and is just unsure because he doesn't understand it.
Like every elite coach, Hird is obsessed with success. So he is susceptible to being conned and trusts the wrong people. He thinks they are doing everything within the rules because he has repeatedly said that and trusts they will. He believes them when they tell him other clubs are miles ahead of them and they need to catch up and that this is so cutting edge the old man Dr doesn't understand it. He is frustrated when other teams are getting this advantage and his is not.
It all comes back to the real culpability here again. Why was Hird exposed to a situation where he could be manipulated by conmen and idiots? Because Robinson and Dank were employed with no due process. No reference checks, background checks or validation of qualifications. Because they weren't adequately supervised or managed by their superiors who also failed to ensure their compliance with critical aspects of their role such as record keeping.
The board, Robson, Hamilton, asleep at the wheel and leaving their club to be violated by incompetents.
Hird meanwhile is repeatedly stating things have to be done correctly, by the book and with Drs approval and most importantly inside the rules and yet he is the villain, even though those very same superiors fail to ensure Hird's wishes are acted on by staff they manage, as well as failing to act or respond to the same concerns.
Agree completely on the failures in appointments, background checks, terrible management by the board and everyone else.
All we disagree on is Hird's level of culpability - you see him as a naive victim driven by a strong desire to succeed, I see him as a man who was perfectly willing to bend the rules and even break them as long as they could get away with it, in order to succeed. Agree that it comes down to subjective interpretation of his motives and other actions/statements we don't know about.
As before I don't see him as the primary villain in all this, but he's up there.
I'm actually indifferent to him coaching again - he's done his time. I hope Essendon appoint him as it means they are still the same old Essington we know and love. If they are smart they won't though.