willo said:So how is "middle class welfare" defined if "middle class" can't be defined?
Plenty on here refer to it, but I've yet to find out its actual "term'.
Is it just a throwaway line, just some *smile* jargon or is it something like ...a person receiving some government money that doesn't really need it? (Means test or not, such as the back to school bonus?)
mld said:'Middle class' can have many definitions, depending on the context it is used in. The phrase 'middle class welfare' refers to government payments being given to people who don't need those payments to live.
I wouldn't call it a '*smile*' phrase, I find it quite effective in communicating what it is intended to. 'Middle class dole' might be better, with recipients being referred to as 'middle class dole bludgers'.
willo said:So in actual fact, you could have someone who is a low income earner but has low cost of living expenses.
Or alternatively someone or a household with a goodly size income but has higher cost of living expenses.
Either could be defined as "middle class welfare" recipients if they receive government payments? That doesn't seem logical, does it?
mld said:Seems quite logical to me.
So really what you're saying, the term "middle class" as in "welfare" is meaningless.
It doesn't matter whether they have a low, medium or high income. It depends on "their" cost of living expenses.
It may seem logical to you, but I find it a bit hard to believe that you can be on a low income (or a very high income) but can still be referred to as "middle class". Doesn't make sense.