A troll makes edgy, conflicting statements that are not supported by any evidence and are clearly posted just to rile a reaction. Now at face value, Dusty's brownlow voting has fallen at a greater rate than his average disposal count but is generally in line with disposal count both before and after his Brownlow winning year. If there's a statistical example of Dusty getting more than his fair share of votes, I'd love to see it.I like when a person says something you don’t like they are automatically labelled as trolls. Or perhaps it’s a person who just see things how they are and aren’t shadowed by media/club hype