RemoteTiger,
On the weekend, I responded to Curtis Bear's post, where he also was a staunch supporter of David Hicks' human rights, and the "relentless inhumane treatment and torture over 5 years" David Hicks is alleged to have endured.
He was beaten....he had a light shone in his eyes and wasn't allowed to sleep....he couldn't talk to his lawyer.....what next?
He didn't get cocoa sprinkled on his rice-bubbles? :hihi
Seriously, to me, this "torture" is childs play compared to the torture dished out to innocent civilians by people like David Hicks.
Take a look Remote....do you think this is inhumane treatment, and relentless torture for these people and their families?
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2002/10/23/1034561533723.html
http://abc.net.au/news/indepth/bali/anniversary_survivors.htm
http://www.theage.com.au/news/war-on-terror/woman-caught-in-bombing-loses-both-legs/2005/07/12/1120934241221.html
http://www.usatoday.com/news/sept11/2002-09-02-jumper_x.htm
To me, THIS is torture.
Now while I am sure you despise terrorists as much as I....I don't doubt that for a second....I do question some of your attitude towards people like Hicks.
It is at a stage now, that terrorists, because they are terrorists, are allowed to do anything they like, because "Well, they're terrorists....I don't condone what they do but..."...and that is all that is said.
It is acceptable and expected practice.
Where are the 6 pages of protest, at the human rights taken away from Jodie Cearns?
Where are the TV stories and newspaper columns editorials, filling up our media everyday, on Gillian Hicks?
As defendants of human rights, I should be reading post after post from yourself and Curtis, about the human rights taken away from the many Australian citizens (most notably, the right to live, which David Hicks still enjoys) by people like Hicks, and by the group Hicks was aiding, training, and abetting with.
But no....it seems Hicks' human rights seem to be more important, because his rights are to perceived to have been abused by the American/Australian Governments, while people like Jodie Cearns and Gillians Hicks, while you may feel sorry for their predicament, well....it was terrorists that got them, so lets get on with it.
While it is honourable that yourself and Curtis are all for human rights, and that should be applauded, you both need to remember this.
Yes, we should be better than terrorists and their way of using human misery to try and push their extreme religous way of living onto the civilised world.
And not in one post have I said that Hicks should be treated in the same manner.
I wouldn't sit in the corner crying if Hicks met the hangman, let me add that....but it angers me more that people seem to be tripping over themselves defending someone, who was training with a group that would kill you and your children, and not lose a wink of sleep over it.
Our forefathers fought for justice and liberty, that is true....yet this justice and liberty was spat on, not by the Australian Government, or the Americans, but by David Hicks....where he took the freedom that our forefathers fought for, to fight alongside terrorists who are killing civilians like you and I!
Yet again, you speak about how David Hicks' rights have been abused.
As I asked Curtis....I would be very interested in your response, if Hicks was not caught, but made it back to Australia, commited a terrorist act, and this was your family:
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/10/01/1064988253351.html
I wonder if your view towards David Hicks' human rights would be paramount in your thoughts then?