Zoe Smith, Tiffany Bakker, Maria Bervanakis, Nadia Salemme, Tamsin Rose and Nathan Vass
Herald Sun
February 10, 2021
Fury is growing as the World Health Organisation was accused of a “whitewash” as it found the coronavirus likely didn’t originate at the Wuhan wet market or come from a lab leak.
Both suggestions that the virus could have originally crossed to humans at the Huanan Seafood Market, or escaped from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) were thrown out in a lengthy joint press conference.
WHO’s findings appeared to largely back China’s protestations that the virus may have originated from outside of its borders and its repeated denials of a lab accident.
It is a move which will only fuel allegations of “China-centric” bias by WHO which have been fiercely lobbied by the US.
And despite offering further explanations, the WHO team admitted they have failed to identify the original source of the COVID-19 outbreak.
Former US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo told Fox News he didn’t believe the WHO team was given the “access that they needed” to do a thorough investigation.
He said Chinese scientists and doctors may not have been able to speak freely with WHO investigators.
Mr Pompeo also claimed that there remained “significant evidence that [COVID-19] came from that laboratory”.
Asked whether his mind had been changed over the alleged lab origins of the virus, Mr Pompeo said, “Not a thing.”
“This is a complete whitewash,” added British MP Tobias Ellwood.
“Given the global economic devastation and death toll this pandemic has caused – never again should a country responsible for an outbreak be allowed to hinder an international investigation for a full 12 months.”
China’s government has long been accused of covering up the pandemic’s origins – and has been continuing to attempt to deflect blame.
WHO scientists appeared alongside their Chinese counterparts as they cast doubt on the Wuhan wet market as the original source and dismissed the lab leak as “extremely unlikely”.
Dr Peter Ben Embarek, the head of the WHO mission, said: “The laboratory incident hypothesis is extremely unlikely to explain the introduction of the virus into the human population.
“Therefore is not in the hypotheses that we will suggest for future studies.”
Instead the team offered speculative explanations including a possible jump from animals to humans elsewhere, or even that it may have come across borders on frozen food.
WHO concluded the virus likely jumped to humans from an animal – but now the question is to where this occurred as doubt was cast over the wet market as the source of the original transmission.
TRANSMISSION FROM BATS ‘UNLIKELY’
The team also admitted the virus could have been circulating in other regions of China “several weeks” before it was identified after an outbreak at the wet market in Wuhan.
Experts believe the disease — which has killed more than 2.3 million people worldwide — originated in bats and could have been transmitted to humans via another mammal.
Dr Embarek said identifying the animal pathway remains a “work in progress”, and the absence of bats in the Wuhan area dimmed the likelihood of direct transmission.
The team handed down their findings at a press conference in Wuhan, after a month of meetings and site visits in the Chinese city where the virus was first identified.
Dr Embarek said that while bats had a “natural reservoir” for coronavirus, it is unlikely that they were in Wuhan.
It was “most likely” to have come from an intermediary species, he said. He also backed up China’s position that there was no evidence of “large outbreaks” in Wuhan before December when the first official cases were recorded.
Animals such as rabbits, ferrets and bamboo rats could be the intermediary, another team member Marion Koopmans added, saying they might be an “entry point” for further investigations.
“Therefore we have tried to find what other animals were introduced that could have introduced the virus,” he said.
“The market was dealing primarily with frozen animal products and mainly seafood but there were also vendors selling products from domesticated wildlife and imported products.
“There is the potential to continue to follow this lead and animals that were supplied to the market in frozen and other semi-processed or raw form.”
The report followed a month of meetings and site visits in Wuhanm, with team members visiting key sites including the Huanan wet market and the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Liang Wannian, head of the China side of the joint mission, said animal transmission remained the likely route, but “the reservoir hosts remain to be identified”.
Dr Embarek quashed the theory that a leak from a virology lab in Wuhan could have caused the pandemic.
“The laboratory incident hypothesis is extremely unlikely,” he said. It “is not in the hypotheses that we will suggest for future studies”.
The mission was a diplomatically knotty one — presaged by fears of a whitewash — with the US demanding a “robust” probe and China firing back with a warning not to “politicise” the investigation.
The WHO experts spent a month in China including two weeks in quarantine. Liang said studies showed the virus could be “carried long-distance on cold chain products”, appearing to nudge towards the theory the virus was imported — an idea that has abounded in China in recent months.
Dr Embarek said “the virus can persist and survive in conditions that are found in these cold and frozen environments”.
“But we don’t really understand if the virus can then transmit to humans and under which conditions this could happen,” he said.
Beijing is desperate to defang criticism of its handling of the chaotic early stages of the outbreak.
It has tried to refocus attention on its handling and recovery while floating the theory that the virus emerged abroad and was brought into China possibly via frozen foods.
Dr Koopmans said the next steps could include searching for “earlier circulation” of the virus.
Reporters were largely kept at arms’ length from the experts during their closely-monitored visit, but snippets of their findings crept out via Twitter and interviews.
Questions have been asked about the relevance of some of their activities to their stated aim of finding the virus source — including a visit to a propaganda exhibition celebrating China’s recovery from the pandemic.
The group spent just an hour at the seafood market where many of the first reported clusters of infections emerged over a year ago.
They also appeared to spend several days inside their hotel, receiving visits from various Chinese officials without venturing out into the city.
Research was carried out at the Wuhan virology institute where they spent nearly four hours. They met with Chinese scientists there including Shi Zhengli, one of China’s leading experts on bat coronaviruses and a deputy director of the Wuhan lab.
Scientists at the laboratory conduct research on some of the world’s most dangerous diseases, including strains of bat coronaviruses similar to COVID-19.
Former US president Donald Trump frequently repeated a controversial theory that a lab leak may have been the source of the pandemic.