I don't see it that way at all, its not in anyone's best interests to have Melbourne's afghan community feel unfairly targeted and pissed off. Sutton could have identified them by suburb. And apologising for it doesn't hurt anyone, in fact it demonstrates humility. I don't understand why anyone would have a problem with this.
The 34 people involved aren't representative of ALL people with afghani heritage currently living in Melbourne. I don't know what the total numbers are, but wager its a lot more than 34.
Sutton said "Having been to Afghanistan a couple of times over the years, I want to be able to reflect on my cultural experiences and the fact I know that there are universal motivations that every family has to do the right thing to protect their own families and the wider community. That is absolutely the case here and I know they're motivated to get on top of this as much as anyone."
He also said the Afghan community in Casey was "a priority for engagement and priority for testing" - because 34 people in that community were infected and may well have infected others within their communities whilst breaching the rules on visits.
It was a statement of fact. There was no generalisation. There was no inference that the 34 people were representative of the overall Afghan community.
Those 34 people through their selfish behaviour made themselves a priority for testing. Nothing racist about it and no need for an apology.
Last edited: