It's stupidity, and a continuation of the mixed messaging that we are being given.We shouldn't be getting haircuts at all.
Why did the Cabinet overturn the 30min decision despite medical advice to the contrary?
It's stupidity, and a continuation of the mixed messaging that we are being given.We shouldn't be getting haircuts at all.
Why did the Cabinet overturn the 30min decision despite medical advice to the contrary?
there you go, i should have known better than to trust such a disreputable source, - JB not twitter.
the best parodies though are always those that are believable.
Relative to other governments, yes.appears the governments actions, and funding, have played a very strong part in allowing Taiwan to remain relatively Covid19 free. Would you agree?
Ok, so there are costs now. I don't see how hurting an entire industry that provides critical inputs to all businesses as resulting in benefits to the investment class including grandmas and grandpas. Price floors lead to supply shortages.Correct. Relatively very little cost across the board as funds are always adjusting their holdings across many stock holdings. They do this to increase their returns so adjusting a utility holding might even end up more beneficial to the grandmas and granddads you refer to.
Wow? So you think utilities haven't focused enough on profits? I beg to differ. Basically you're arguing the poor should be charged even more (to the already massive yearly increases for energy) to pay for the predominantly on average much better off investors. I'm all for profits for investors, I am a significant investor myself, but when it comes to essential services I definitely do not think they should be focusing EVEN MORE on profits. Essential services should NOT be focused on profits for investors as their primary goal. That view will never change for me. Poor people should be able to heat their house in winter.
US death toll is quite low relatively but they're about to hit that 3-4 week fatality rate that other countries have seen. I can see that mounting very quickly.
Ok, so there are costs now. I don't see how hurting an entire industry that provides critical inputs to all businesses as resulting in benefits to the investment class including grandmas and grandpas. Price floors lead to supply shortages.
I think all businesses should be left alone to charge whatever they want and it's not for faceless bureaucrats that have no skin the game to say otherwise. Markets with undistorted prices are the only rational way to allocate resources. If you want poor people to be able to heat their homes then get out of the way of these businesses in meeting the demand. Leaving such a critical process to central planning committees is the opposite of what you should want if that's what you care about. Profits go to those people/businesses that best meet consumer demand and they aren't received at the expense of the consumer (unless the government prevents competition).
Yeh its clear previous experiences had them prepared. Not sure many Taiwanese have heard of Mises.Assuming the NBC article is factual the Taiwanese government has made many interventions to help keep people safe, including:
the use of Taiwan’s Centers for Disease Control - gov funded i assume
inspections of incoming travellers- gov funded i assume
sent a team of experts to Chine- gov funded i assume
requiring hospitals to test- government intervention, and i assume funded
tracing those infected and their contacts- gov intervention and funded
set up their Central Epidemic Command Center - gov funded
cleaning of suspected infected areas- gov funded
banned arrivals from Wuhan, then other places, early- gov intervention
use of temperature monitors at airports- gov funded i assume, or at least gov intervention
health data sent to CDC- gov intervention
mandatory quarantining- gov intervention
fines for those who ignore quarantine- gov intervention
control over equipment and price setting- gov intervention
and free health care- gov intervention
appears the governments actions, and funding, have played a very strong part in allowing Taiwan to remain relatively Covid19 free. Would you agree?
Pretty cool that this Melbourne based company Endo X has developed a 15 minute coronavirus test with 500,000 units to be rolled out shortly.
New 15-minute COVID 19 test kit heading to Australia
More than 500,000 new 15-minute coronavirus test kits are set to be distributed across Australia next week.www.9news.com.au
There are plenty of staff they can offload.
Ok, so there are costs now. I don't see how hurting an entire industry that provides critical inputs to all businesses as resulting in benefits to the investment class including grandmas and grandpas. Price floors lead to supply shortages.
I think all businesses should be left alone to charge whatever they want and it's not for faceless bureaucrats that have no skin the game to say otherwise. Markets with undistorted prices are the only rational way to allocate resources. If you want poor people to be able to heat their homes then get out of the way of these businesses in meeting the demand. Leaving such a critical process to central planning committees is the opposite of what you should want if that's what you care about. Profits go to those people/businesses that best meet consumer demand and they aren't received at the expense of the consumer (unless the government prevents competition).
What I’m saying is that we need to focus on the costs side of profit here not the revenue side. Reducing the revenue side won’t help because it will hurt the utility businesses, their investors and ultimately their consumers as they can’t run at a loss. The margins are razor thin.It's OK I get your view, you've made it abundantly clear. In unprecedented times you don't think utility companies should be doing their bit to ease the pain of those suffering right now. They should charge more because they aren't profiteering enough. It's the poor person's fault if they can't afford it (ironically this includes the grandpas and grandmas). I think a majority would vehemently disagree with you but that's just me. I'm finished on this topic.
Who said anything about raising prices?Right, so the businesses should raise prices at the same time as they "offload" people to ensure profitability and protect the "Investment class".
Do you seriously wonder why people view neo-liberals as a pack of selfish, uncaring, greedy m*****f***ers?
DS
Scomo just spoke well. He obviously doesn't want further restrictions on business. The states have the power to go further. Surely we wait and see what influence the current restrictions have before going further.
I'd spoken to friends about the possibility of using vacant hotels to put people in quarantine coming from outside of Australia. Makes a lot of sense and sustains some revenue into the hotels industry in a time when they don't have any. Protects all of society and will help the hotels industry.
I won't be critical that it could have happened before but happy that it is going on now. Not sure if this is an Andrews thing or if its a National thing.
What I’m saying is that we need to focus on the costs side of profit here not the revenue side. Reducing the revenue side won’t help because it will hurt the utility businesses, their investors and ultimately their consumers as they can’t run at a loss. The margins are razor thin.
What we should be doing is making it easier for these companies to reduce their costs. If they want to market themselves as the helper of people in tough times then they can do that. If they don’t then that’s on them. It is their call and no one else’s.