Spot onPrefer to wait for next year if they're going to make a mockery of it.
Spot onPrefer to wait for next year if they're going to make a mockery of it.
Hello Antman and Baloo.......
It's been an interesting couple of weeks indeed.
I'm not sure why you kept asking me to produce 'facts' when others already had - but - I'll assume you were singling me out.
CV-19 evolves each day (eg the Facts are adjusted based on increased testing, impact of anti-virals, death rates etc).
The ABC.news.com has a good running commentary that articulates this reasonably well - albeit their tone has adjusted slowly since Friday where the apocalyptic exponential rate (predicted to see a doubling of cases every 48hrs) has been slightly toned down now that it's reduced to 15% per day - and might trend further south.
Of course News.com.au continues to prattle on and create scaremongering (click-bait!)
It's not about loud noises.
It's more about shouting down a denier - and yes - I am a denier.
CV-19 will (IMHO) be shown to be a bad flu. Maybe even less than a bad flu. Early estimates from the WHO predicted a 4% death rate yet it is now well below 1% (not sure re Italy and I sure as hell don't trust anything out of China! I mean seriously - does anyone???).
In Germany and Korea - well below 1%. Germany is getting even lower (most recently 2-3 in every 1000) and hence CV-19 is daily looking more and more like a bad H1N1 like 'flu' ........... and TBH ............ hopefully the GOVT starts reviewing our response (albeit I've just seen that public gatherings have been reduced to two persons!!!).
Kudo's to the GOVT for taking the measure they did to reduce the initial spread - because there is no vaccine - and we simply could not have controlled it by any other means - but regardless - by all available data it's a bad flu.
Facts?
1. 16 deaths to date (4600+ infected).
2. The 2017 flu in Australia killed 750+
3. The 2017 flu in USA killed 79,000
I'm not sure what the plagiarism laws are - but you're welcome to see the latest data out of the UK and USA (please read Dr Jayanta Bhattacharya)
I do hope that I'm right - not to prove a point - but to remove the hyperbola and media driven leadership (in parts) that is in serious danger of driving us off an economic cliff that will take a generation to recover from.
Then again - I could simply be wrong
...... shame on me for voicing an opinion (but then again you are welcome to support China's ultimate objective!)
Hello Antman and Baloo.......
It's been an interesting couple of weeks indeed.
I'm not sure why you kept asking me to produce 'facts' when others already had - but - I'll assume you were singling me out.
CV-19 evolves each day (eg the Facts are adjusted based on increased testing, impact of anti-virals, death rates etc).
The ABC.news.com has a good running commentary that articulates this reasonably well - albeit their tone has adjusted slowly since Friday where the apocalyptic exponential rate (predicted to see a doubling of cases every 48hrs) has been slightly toned down now that it's reduced to 15% per day - and might trend further south.
Of course News.com.au continues to prattle on and create scaremongering (click-bait!)
It's not about loud noises.
It's more about shouting down a denier - and yes - I am a denier.
CV-19 will (IMHO) be shown to be a bad flu. Maybe even less than a bad flu. Early estimates from the WHO predicted a 4% death rate yet it is now well below 1% (not sure re Italy and I sure as hell don't trust anything out of China! I mean seriously - does anyone???).
In Germany and Korea - well below 1%. Germany is getting even lower (most recently 2-3 in every 1000) and hence CV-19 is daily looking more and more like a bad H1N1 like 'flu' ........... and TBH ............ hopefully the GOVT starts reviewing our response (albeit I've just seen that public gatherings have been reduced to two persons!!!).
Kudo's to the GOVT for taking the measure they did to reduce the initial spread - because there is no vaccine - and we simply could not have controlled it by any other means - but regardless - by all available data it's a bad flu.
Facts?
1. 16 deaths to date (4600+ infected).
2. The 2017 flu in Australia killed 750+
3. The 2017 flu in USA killed 79,000
I'm not sure what the plagiarism laws are - but you're welcome to see the latest data out of the UK and USA (please read Dr Jayanta Bhattacharya)
I do hope that I'm right - not to prove a point - but to remove the hyperbola and media driven leadership (in parts) that is in serious danger of driving us off an economic cliff that will take a generation to recover from.
Then again - I could simply be wrong
...... shame on me for voicing an opinion (but then again you are welcome to support China's ultimate objective!)
LOL!!!!You sir, have no idea what you're taking about.
Hello Antman and Baloo.......
It's been an interesting couple of weeks indeed.
I'm not sure why you kept asking me to produce 'facts' when others already had - but - I'll assume you were singling me out.
CV-19 evolves each day (eg the Facts are adjusted based on increased testing, impact of anti-virals, death rates etc).
The ABC.news.com has a good running commentary that articulates this reasonably well - albeit their tone has adjusted slowly since Friday where the apocalyptic exponential rate (predicted to see a doubling of cases every 48hrs) has been slightly toned down now that it's reduced to 15% per day - and might trend further south.
Of course News.com.au continues to prattle on and create scaremongering (click-bait!)
It's not about loud noises.
It's more about shouting down a denier - and yes - I am a denier.
CV-19 will (IMHO) be shown to be a bad flu. Maybe even less than a bad flu. Early estimates from the WHO predicted a 4% death rate yet it is now well below 1% (not sure re Italy and I sure as hell don't trust anything out of China! I mean seriously - does anyone???).
In Germany and Korea - well below 1%. Germany is getting even lower (most recently 2-3 in every 1000) and hence CV-19 is daily looking more and more like a bad H1N1 like 'flu' ........... and TBH ............ hopefully the GOVT starts reviewing our response (albeit I've just seen that public gatherings have been reduced to two persons!!!).
Kudo's to the GOVT for taking the measure they did to reduce the initial spread - because there is no vaccine - and we simply could not have controlled it by any other means - but regardless - by all available data it's a bad flu.
Facts?
1. 16 deaths to date (4600+ infected).
2. The 2017 flu in Australia killed 750+
3. The 2017 flu in USA killed 79,000
I'm not sure what the plagiarism laws are - but you're welcome to see the latest data out of the UK and USA (please read Dr Jayanta Bhattacharya)
I do hope that I'm right - not to prove a point - but to remove the hyperbola and media driven leadership (in parts) that is in serious danger of driving us off an economic cliff that will take a generation to recover from.
Then again - I could simply be wrong
...... shame on me for voicing an opinion (but then again you are welcome to support China's ultimate objective!)
3 grand finals to make more money? Where does this come from? Outrageous. (I know it’s hutchy)
Meanwhile China, North Korea n Russia can't be bothered reporting anything. So I doubt we'll ever get a true indication, ever.Might be only Italy reporting properly. Also USA is ridiculously under reporting. Might be a while before we get a true indication of mortality rates
The purist in me cringed, but his argument had some merit in that after all this is over, the AFL needs to do whatever it can to maximise revenue.
But if the public sees it as a cash grab, wil they actually go?
Listened to Hutchy's podcast where he laid out his ideas for the 2020 season if it happens.
3 Groups:
WA & SA Teams
NSW & QLD Teams
"MCG" Teams (big drawing clubs)
Other Vic Teams
All play each other twice. 10 Team finals. Best of 3 Grand Finals.
The purist in me cringed, but his argument had some merit in that after all this is over, the AFL needs to do whatever it can to maximise revenue. His model would ensure games like RFC v Pies, WCE v Freo, Crows v Port etc happen twice to maximise crowds. Less travel means less expenses.
If you could trust the AFL just to make these changes as a once off just for this year, I could live with it. Let's face it, the season is already screwed. But I don't trust the AFL.
that's 4 groups and 18 doesn't go into 4Listened to Hutchy's podcast where he laid out his ideas for the 2020 season if it happens.
3 Groups:
WA & SA Teams
NSW & QLD Teams
"MCG" Teams (big drawing clubs)
Other Vic Teams
All play each other twice. 10 Team finals. Best of 3 Grand Finals.
The purist in me cringed, but his argument had some merit in that after all this is over, the AFL needs to do whatever it can to maximise revenue. His model would ensure games like RFC v Pies, WCE v Freo, Crows v Port etc happen twice to maximise crowds. Less travel means less expenses.
If you could trust the AFL just to make these changes as a once off just for this year, I could live with it. Let's face it, the season is already screwed. But I don't trust the AFL.
that's 4 groups and 18 doesn't go into 4
After being starved of games, would you care if it's a cash grab when you get to see RFC vs Pies twice?
It's always a big deal when the tigers are on top.Won't be able to answer until we get there. Maybe footy won't be much of a big deal any more.