Changes v Bombers

[TigerForce]

Ridley out for the Bummers. Huge loss.

Their backline looks VFL standard.

Lyncho to kick 10.

 

[mrposhman]

Ridley out for the Bummers. Huge loss.

Their backline looks VFL standard.

Lynch, Jack and Dusty are licking their chops at this defense.

Reid probably has to take Lynch due to height, this will only be Reids 1st game. Lycnh to kick a bag again I bet.
Laverde probably needs to take Jack - Jack should be too smart
Kelly probably takes Dusty, who will throw him around like a ragdoll.

Surely they have to roll Francis back, which would make them look really small in the forward line, bar 2MP.

Match them in the midfield and this should be a comfortable win.

 

[RoarEmotion]

There is a reason their percentage is 75 and ours is 117. And you would say our team is in way better shape and form with personnel than earlier in the year

 

[Dont Argue]

Our side looks sloooow again. Got exposed a bit for that last week I reckon.

Agreed.
Edwards not a like for like with Pickett. Will miss his run and aggression

 

[Carter]

Probs no one better than Ross for the defensive running but it’s unfortunate.

VFL player and that will not change despite the many rose-coloureds round these parts

 

[22nd Man]

I’m not sold on our overall team balance this week…. I think Marlion may be the most significant out…controlling the wings will be critical this week (well most weeks really)

A first gamer out. A tall back and a wingman out and we cannot rebalance?

 

[JR8]

View attachment 15456

Geezus what a bunch of no names (apart from Heppell)!!!

If we don't win this comfortably then we might as well start the re-build!!!!

 

[Tortured Tiger]

There is a reason their percentage is 75 and ours is 117. And you would say our team is in way better shape and form with personnel than earlier in the year

Although playing the Eagles certainly helped as well haha

 

[AstuteTiger]

Although playing the Eagles certainly helped as well haha

Sure does but the dees to have already played, the Eagles, North and Bombers. Percentage booster at its finest.

 

[year of the tiger]

The media have done us a favour I reckon piling on the bumbers.

We will be expecting them to come out physical and should be prepared for it - no surprises.

 

[shad]

I'd like to see Shai V Heppell.

 

[TigerForce]

What's the reaming forecast with these flogs?

 

[caesar]

Probs no one better than Ross for the defensive running but it’s unfortunate.

VFL player and that will not change despite the many rose-coloureds round these parts

Well you just said no one better so don't know what rose-coloured glasses has to do with anything.

 

[angle ankle]

Our side looks sloooow again. Got exposed a bit for that last week I reckon.

slow & small a bad combo.
lucky weve got shai & george.

 

[craig]

What's the reaming forecast with these flogs?

View attachment 15457

I'm guessing not as bad as it would be if it was DeBoy or Razor, or that other campaigner O Gorman.

 

[MalenyTiger]

Or Fleer. He has always had it in for us.

 

[TigerForce]

I'm guessing not as bad as it would be if it was DeBoy or Razor, or that other campaigner O Gorman.

Hopefully. Just get a feel the poor Bummers are gonna get a few sympathy frees.

 

[tigerlove]

Selections logical but thought Stack may have been made emergency.

Stack was poor in the VFL last game. Couldn't get near it. Needs games to find consistent form.

 

[tigerlove]

Anyone think our sub should play first half in the vfl?

Nope. Why?

 

[seven]

Expecting the bummers to come out all huffing and puffing for the first 15m
If we can kick goals early they’ll fall in a heap and be stuffed by 2Q