3Aw reporting that Teague was told yesterday his services will no longer be required after rd 23.
Pretty sure he's still contracted isn't he? There is no way Scumton will resist the temptation of the messiah complex again; they will go hard after Clarkson.3Aw reporting that Teague was told yesterday his services will no longer be required after rd 23.
Pretty sure he's still contracted isn't he? There is no way Scumton will resist the temptation of the messiah complex again; they will go hard after Clarkson.
And if Teague is contracted that will severely hamper the management of the soft cap.
Ha ha yeah didn't think of it that way.Easy fixed - they pay Clarkson $5 for coaching next year and Hawthorn are responsible for the rest of his income.
DS
I said that was a possibility on the Clarko thread.Easy fixed - they pay Clarkson $5 for coaching next year and Hawthorn are responsible for the rest of his income.
DS
Don't have a great record with "Super" coaches.Pretty sure he's still contracted isn't he? There is no way Scumton will resist the temptation of the messiah complex again; they will go hard after Clarkson.
And if Teague is contracted that will severely hamper the management of the soft cap.
That's good news.Could bring in the best coach in the land and it still wouldn't matter right now.
The culture of the place is that far stuffed and it's not something fixed overnight.
It can't be changed by one or a handful, it has to be a total buy-in from everybody driving and adhering to standards and keeping each-other accountable. The club hasn't had that for many, many years.
The closest it's been after 2001 I'd say was during the Judd era, where fragments of the group bought in to how he would prepare and apply himself. But then there were also tales flying around at the time of how young players putting in extra gym work would be laughed at by more senior player(s) passing by. If that's true, then how must that have affected those players' careers? And the flow-on effect from that, where their careers feed into the next era?
This is a Carlton group made up of far too many conditional footballers, and one of the problems now is the only players I see really hurting after a loss are Weitering, Walsh and Silvagni. Those three can't change the culture by themselves.
This would be brilliant. Sign Clarko up for 3-5 years, massively back end the deal. When things haven’t improved or have turned to *smile* after 2 years, the behind the scenes power brokers will get him sacked, as they seemed to have been doing for the past 20 years or so, they will have to pay him out and they will be hamstrung with their soft cap with the new coachI said that was a possibility on the Clarko thread.
If you think about it, the Beyond Blues along with all other clubs will be thinking that the soft cap will increase back to normal maybe, in 3-5 years time. Therefore, when you've got a situation like they have, they ask Clarko to back end his deal while they pay out Teague. Clarko doesn't care coz he's getting the difference paid by Hawthorn. That helps the Beyond Blues not having to pay two senior coaching salaries next year and utilising the soft cap to its best degree in 2022. They amortise Clarko out over the next 3 to 5 years or whatever.
It then leaves Hawthorn with two senior coaching salaries to pay in 2022 and severely impacting their offield personnel and support structure for a first year coach. They could of course, ask Mitchell to back end his contract as well, however. But Hawthorn won't have the flexibility that the Beyond Blues will have i.e. up to $1m+. Hawthorn might have $200k to $300k at best. So still a significant impact on their soft cap for 2022 with a first year coach.
I'm sure we could learn to live with this for at least another generation or twoThis is a Carlton group made up of far too many conditional footballers, and one of the problems now is the only players I see really hurting after a loss are Weitering, Walsh and Silvagni. Those three can't change the culture by themselves.
Judd has been a bit abrasive when in the media but he calls it how he sees it and he not a dumb campaigner.If the rumors are true, and they probably are, Chris Judd deserve an apology from a few so-called journos and assorted footy commentators. Called our Teague’s inexperience while he was only a caretaker and copped a huge backlash for his trouble.
Well said BB Carlton are what the Tigers were every time we thought we were moving on up but its was falsehood.Could bring in the best coach in the land and it still wouldn't matter right now.
The culture of the place is that far stuffed and it's not something fixed overnight.
It can't be changed by one or a handful, it has to be a total buy-in from everybody driving and adhering to standards and keeping each-other accountable. The club hasn't had that for many, many years.
The closest it's been after 2001 I'd say was during the Judd era, where fragments of the group bought in to how he would prepare and apply himself. But then there were also tales flying around at the time of how young players putting in extra gym work would be laughed at by more senior player(s) passing by. If that's true, then how must that have affected those players' careers? And the flow-on effect from that, where their careers feed into the next era?
This is a Carlton group made up of far too many conditional footballers, and one of the problems now is the only players I see really hurting after a loss are Weitering, Walsh and Silvagni. Those three can't change the culture by themselves.
Pacifically, and for all intensive purposes , I have the upmost respect for Tom Browne…..
Could bring in the best coach in the land and it still wouldn't matter right now.
The culture of the place is that far stuffed and it's not something fixed overnight.
It can't be changed by one or a handful, it has to be a total buy-in from everybody driving and adhering to standards and keeping each-other accountable. The club hasn't had that for many, many years.
The closest it's been after 2001 I'd say was during the Judd era, where fragments of the group bought in to how he would prepare and apply himself. But then there were also tales flying around at the time of how young players putting in extra gym work would be laughed at by more senior player(s) passing by. If that's true, then how must that have affected those players' careers? And the flow-on effect from that, where their careers feed into the next era?
This is a Carlton group made up of far too many conditional footballers, and one of the problems now is the only players I see really hurting after a loss are Weitering, Walsh and Silvagni. Those three can't change the culture by themselves.
I used to work for a privately owned company. Two blokes owned it pretty sure one had 51% the other 49%.Pacifically, and for all intensive purposes , I have the upmost respect for Tom Browne…..