I dont really have a problem with the brownlow being the umpires award. I reckon making it a coaches award gives too much risk to bias- we coaches give votes late in the season to a rival Brownlow contender? and we have seen with the All Australian teams how the so-called experts view the game. we would probably end up with Tom Stewart winning the medal every year. (as long as Corey Enright doesn't steal too many votes.)In Australia, there was no betting officially allowed at all on sport apart from horse racing before 1980.
The invention of the internet led to an explosion in online gambling in this country & it's now infecting every aspect of every sport.
Odds are always stacked against you though no matter what you bet on..might have the odd win but eventually you will lose.
Ultimately though I just hope this is a catalyst for taking the voting off the umpires. Have never felt comfortable with them casting the votes for the most prestigious award.
as for integrity we would end up with commentators discussing the brownlow while also giving votes.
i guess the AFL could always just get an ex-Geelong person to award the medal.